| |
In lugnet.cad, Rui Manuel Silva Martins writes:
<SNIP>
> But I personnaly wouldn't sugest someone to use W2000, if they weren't • already
> using NT. Either NT or W2000 are big Memory and CPU Hogs.
> So, if you want to keep your speed, just wait a little bit more and get • windows
> Millenium, the sequel to Win98.
>
> See ya
> Rui Martins
That's somehow new for me, since at home (I'm using a PII 350 with 128MB-Ram)
programs like MLCad are definitly faster on NT than on 95 or 98. Sure the
display response and boot-time is shorter than on NT, but when it goes to
calculate things NT seems to be faster than anything else ... except Linux :-)
From friends I heared similar things.
Michael
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Windows 2000
|
| (...) You probably have a bad configuration on your Win95/98, possibly bad/slow/old drivers, try to updated them. The only advantage that you could have with NT is if you have more than one CPU. Since Win95/98 can't (don't now how to) use more than (...) (24 years ago, 17-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | Re: Windows 2000
|
| Michael, I believe the reason that NT is faster in big machines is that it can address large amounts of memory more quickly. When I was discussing NT with a Photoshop expert, he said that for 128MB+ machines, it is much faster in NT, as Win9x can (...) (24 years ago, 17-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Windows 2000
|
| (...) I can assure you that Windows 2000, has the "cmd" program of NT, i.e. the NT, DOS 7.0 compatible command interpreter. Here at work, several colleagues already are using it! And as it looks until now, it has improved on stability over NT. But I (...) (24 years ago, 17-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
20 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
