Subject:
|
Re: A discovery? and part 3475
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Sun, 2 Apr 2000 14:36:44 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
6220 times
|
| |
|
|
Tore Eriksson <tore.eriksson@mbox325.swipnet.se> writes:
> Not just 4-4edge - it takes all between 1/16 through 16/16 and 1/48
> through 48/48.
Oops, sorry 'bout that.
> This is what I have to do for example now as I struggle with the
> horse's tail. Maybe your program will speed up that procedure, but
> that calls to the need of removing the edge lines.
Wow, you're working with the horse? You have my deepest respect!
I think that using one tool or another is mostly a matter of taste. I
haven't written LDraw-mode to compete with anybody else's tool, but
because I like to work with Emacs. Your program looks very useful,
and probably fits your way of working better.
> The advantage with PIPE is that hopefully programs like L3P will
> translate directly to conical POV primitives instead of facetted
> surfaces from the pure LDraw code. I understand that this is
> impossible with arbitrary connected curves.
So you're suggesting to add the PIPE META commands to the LDraw
format? I'm probably not the correct person to decide such a
question. We can see what other people say.
Fredrik
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: A discovery? and part 3475
|
| (...) Not just 4-4edge - it takes all between 1/16 through 16/16 and 1/48 through 48/48. (...) I see (I think...) If the two arbitrary connected curves run parallelly, I use LDS' EXTRUDE function, if not, I have to make arrangements like this in (...) (27 years ago, 2-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
