 | | Re: 0 Un-official part...
|
|
----- Original Message ----- From: Tore Eriksson <tore.eriksson@mbox3...wipnet.se> To: <lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com> Sent: Sunday, March 05, 2000 7:30 AM Subject: 0 Un-official part... (...) part description. Why? This is my way to mark (...) (...) (25 years ago, 5-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | 0 Un-official part...
|
|
As some of you may have noticed, I put an @-sign at the beginning of the part description. Why? This is my way to mark un-official parts or elements so I can both use them and easily list all un-official parts. See, Mklist puts them first in the (...) (25 years ago, 5-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: MPD spec
|
|
Rui: (...) It's "Ada", not "ADA"! Neither does everybody have MS-Windows installed (and I am one of them). I don't mind distributing binaries for DOS and MS-Windows, but somebody else has to compile them. [...] There is a very good reason that I (...) (25 years ago, 4-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: MPD spec [DAT]
|
|
(...) OK, I saw it after asking, but what about the Win/DOS X86 version. NOTE: Not every one uses ADA, i.e. has an ADA Compiler Installed. (...) The following proposition may may seem awkward, but bare with me. This is My proposition for changing (...) (25 years ago, 3-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: MPD spec
|
|
Rui: (...) The first. (...) You can't trust that the MPD file and the first file in the MPD file has the same name, but it will generally be the case. (...) There is a Linux binary at <URL: (URL) >. (...) No. (...) If the interpreter is aware that (...) (25 years ago, 3-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: MPD spec
|
|
(...) Sorry to only get back now. I have the following questions: - Which (inline) file in the (.mpd) file is considered the root of the model - First (would be my obvious choice) ? - Last ? - we have to find out which ? The previous question raises (...) (25 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw extended colors
|
|
(...) I will have to find a way how to define such colors in MLCad but I think I will provide an option where the user can define if he/she likes 24bit or 12bit colors. Generally no problem :-) Michael (25 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw extended colors
|
|
I would if I could, but it's hard for me to imagine how this can be supported by LDS... /Tore (...) (25 years ago, 1-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | LDraw extended colors
|
|
The LDraw colors are 0-15, 32-47, 256-511 (and of course 16 and 24). Paul Gyugyi defined some more colors for LDLite, 17-23, 25, 57 and "Direct Colors" in the range 0x04000000-0x07FFFFFF. As MLCad supports these colors, I'm going to add support for (...) (25 years ago, 1-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: oops. i'm new at this
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Jonathan Gevaryahu writes: [snip] (...) Jonathan, make sure you understand how to use the predefined subparts, we also call them primitives. If the shape of the part you intend to do isn't too compicated, there is a lot to gain (...) (25 years ago, 1-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts update
|
|
(...) I've been tied up lately, so I've been falling behind on checking parts into the process. I've got 86 files (new parts, fixed parts, subparts, and primitives) ready to be voted on. There are at least 60 more to look at before I can consider (...) (25 years ago, 28-Feb-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Are any of these parts done/in progress (BIG POST)
|
|
(...) It's looking good! (...) Model first, get part numbers later... :) Steve (25 years ago, 28-Feb-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Are any of these parts done/in progress (BIG POST)
|
|
(...) How about whining? Tooooooodd, will you pretty pretty please have someone make the samurai minifigs/armour/equipment for me, pwease!!! (Honestly, I can't be the only Lugnetter to like the Ninja (now called Samurai by me) theme)). *sighs* I'm (...) (25 years ago, 28-Feb-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Are any of these parts done/in progress (BIG POST)
|
|
----- Original Message ----- From: Kevin B <kevinb01@netfocus.net> To: <lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com> Sent: Sunday, February 27, 2000 8:56 PM Subject: Re: Are any of these parts done/in progress (BIG POST) (...) (URL) about that! Kevin B (25 years ago, 28-Feb-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Are any of these parts done/in progress (BIG POST)
|
|
----- Original Message ----- From: Jonathan Gevaryahu <Jgevaryahu@hotmail.com (remove)> To: <lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com> Sent: Saturday, February 26, 2000 7:42 PM Subject: Are any of these parts done/in progress (BIG POST) (...) Check this out: (URL) (...) (25 years ago, 28-Feb-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Parts update
|
|
When is the next Parts update running? Is there a voting page up? T Burger (25 years ago, 28-Feb-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Are any of these parts done/in progress (BIG POST)
|
|
(...) Jonathan G: Take the above advice with a very large grain of salt. :-) Asking for parts to be made isn't actually a bad idea, inherently speaking. Since the entire L-CAD/LDraw parts effort is a spare-time endeavor for people, it all depends on (...) (25 years ago, 27-Feb-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: oops. i'm new at this
|
|
(...) No, your tone was fine. There is a *big* difference between ... [parts] which I would like to know the status of... and ... I need these parts made soon ... My preference for authoring is LDAO (with LDLite for real-time preview), but your (...) (25 years ago, 27-Feb-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: oops. i'm new at this
|
|
(...) Anybody are free to model any parts they feel like doing, but it is in their own interest to see if anybody else are working on the same part already. Without the part tracker working, I see no better solution than to post a query here. Also (...) (25 years ago, 27-Feb-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: oops. i'm new at this
|
|
oops. sorry if I insulted anyone. I intended no harm by that post. (i'm very new to this newsgroup, and i haven't yet found out what is looked down upon) uh, actually, if I could, *I* would like to try at modeling some of the parts on that list! I (...) (25 years ago, 27-Feb-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
