To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / 3757 (-10)
  Re: Primitives to Hi-Res or not...
 
In lugnet.cad.dev, Imre Papp writes: [snip] (...) [snip] One note about those curved tracks: Because of part details, circular primitives can't be used efficiently for modelling curved tracks. I refer to the tapering at both ends and the saw- theeth (...) (25 years ago, 25-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Primitives to Hi-Res or not...
 
(...) There are two issues here. a) what resolution is appropriate to realistically render a part, b) how are the circular features of that a likely to connect/interact with other parts or feature of the same part. Issue b) is why we cannot (...) (25 years ago, 25-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Primitives to Hi-Res or not...
 
Paul Easter wrote about Hi-Res primitives: (...) L3P will correctly render any DAT file. But it will not substitute any Hi-Res primitives until I release the next version. I did program Hi-Res support in June 1999, so I guess it's about time for a (...) (25 years ago, 25-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Primitives to Hi-Res or not...
 
(...) My opinion is that we do need high res circular primitives (edge, disc, cyli, etc) in cases where the part includes curves/surfaces with a significantly larger diameter than 'usual'. The good old STUD.dat (and its familiy) looks OK with 16 (...) (25 years ago, 25-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Primitives to Hi-Res or not...
 
Ok, Can some one tell me where we are heading with these Hi-Res primitives. Today I created the Hi-Res versions of several of the "normal" primitives. Then I edited the main "normal" ones to use the Hi-Res instead. WOW! There was about a 10-20% (...) (25 years ago, 25-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Lost mail at partsref
 
(...) It should be 6 x 4. I'll update the file, so they match. (...) My bad. The number should be 43. Steve (25 years ago, 24-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: can someone please make me this part?
 
(...) Yeah, it is. Those transmissions are really neat too... -Tim (URL) timcourtne ICQ: 23951114 (25 years ago, 24-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: mirroring parts
 
Tore Eriksson <tore.eriksson@mbox3...wipnet.se> wrote in message news:388873F6.9A09BC...pnet.se... (...) look (...) been (...) doesn't (...) LDAO's Gridder works well for things like this, too. -John Van (25 years ago, 24-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Can anyone explain me why?
 
(...) ... (...) I tried a dummy part using 48\1-8disc.dat (the original) and it works fine on my system. Also, your most recent 2951.dat draws correctly on my system, both in LDLite and LDraw. I'm guessing there was a problem in the original (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Lost mail at partsref
 
(...) ...[snip]... (...) ...[snip]... (...) Steve, I believe that the description of the first file listed above should read "Flag 4 x 6" (and not "6 x 4"). If not, then the description of the subfile should be changed to read "6 x 4" to match the (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR