Subject:
|
Primitives to Hi-Res or not...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Tue, 25 Jan 2000 02:33:22 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
652 times
|
| |
|
|
Ok, Can some one tell me where we are heading with these Hi-Res primitives.
Today I created the Hi-Res versions of several of the "normal" primitives.
Then I edited the main "normal" ones to use the Hi-Res instead. WOW!
There was about a 10-20% slowdown. Not too bad as long as the model wasn't too
large.
Will this cause a problem with renering POV? So far I have not been patient
enough to get the dat files converted into a POV'able file. I have tried, just
not succeeded yet.
I welcome all comments,
Paul
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Primitives to Hi-Res or not...
|
| (...) My opinion is that we do need high res circular primitives (edge, disc, cyli, etc) in cases where the part includes curves/surfaces with a significantly larger diameter than 'usual'. The good old STUD.dat (and its familiy) looks OK with 16 (...) (25 years ago, 25-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | Re: Primitives to Hi-Res or not...
|
| Paul Easter wrote about Hi-Res primitives: (...) L3P will correctly render any DAT file. But it will not substitute any Hi-Res primitives until I release the next version. I did program Hi-Res support in June 1999, so I guess it's about time for a (...) (25 years ago, 25-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
