 | | Re: Hidden surface removal, and vertex order in part/primitive DAT files —Jacob Sparre Andersen
|
| | | Gary Williams: (...) I still think using 0 FACE ( CW | CCW | DOUBLE-SIDED | UNKNOWN ) is most practical. Play well, Jacob ---...--- -- E-mail: sparre@cats.nbi.dk -- -- Web...: <URL:(URL) -- ---...--- (25 years ago, 2-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Hidden surface removal, and vertex order in part/primitive DAT files —Gary Williams
|
| | | | | Jacob Sparre Andersen wrote in message ... (...) That works for me. I don't suppose there's an official standards-setting body of people charged with voting on extensions to the .dat format, is there? Maybe it's time to form one. -Gary (25 years ago, 2-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Hidden surface removal, and vertex order in part/primitive DAT files —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | | (...) We're it. So to speak. Steve (25 years ago, 3-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Hidden surface removal, and vertex order in part/primitive DAT files —Michael Lachmann
|
| | | | Jacob Sparre Andersen wrote in message ... (...) also (...) but (...) the (...) an (...) Is this the standard now, or at least could we make it the standard ???? Mike (25 years ago, 4-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Hidden surface removal, and vertex order in part/primitive DAT files —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) That's what we're doing now--figuring out what the standard should be. Both the function and the syntax. But "standard" is an odd term in this case. In my mind the LDraw standard is defined as "code which is recognized and interpreted by (...) (25 years ago, 4-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Hidden surface removal, and vertex order in part/primitive DAT files —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) Forgot the footnote: 1- There's an interesting distinction between 'valid' and 'well-formed' contructions. LDraw will allow line-breaks as whitespace in commands, so: 1 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 3001.dat is valid, but it's not well-formed. (...) (25 years ago, 4-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
