 | | Re: DAT voting page up —Jonathan Wilson
|
| | | (...) i had lego when i was young but i do not have any internions to buy lego any time soon because if i got back into it it would cost a fortune. also regarding the details noone has modeled the small imprinted lego logo on parts (26 years ago, 25-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: DAT voting page up —Terry Keller
|
| | | | | (...) Perhaps because it would be too small to resolve clearly when rendering - and would add greatly to rendering times. -- Terry K -- (26 years ago, 25-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: DAT voting page up —Paul Gyugyi
|
| | | | | | (...) Yes, at the resolution of LDRAW, the logo would show up as stray pixels of high contrast, and not look good at all. But in photographs/rendering, having those logos makes all the difference in the world. It's IMHO the reason MegaBlocks always (...) (26 years ago, 26-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: DAT voting page up —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | | (...) Would using the curved primitives work well or badly (since they are just angled polygons)? Steve (26 years ago, 26-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: DAT voting page up —Roy Earls
|
| | | | jonathan wilson wrote in message ... (...) on (...) Some POV Ray libs can render the logo on the studs and round the edges of the bricks, but I usually render without these, mainly because my renderings will never likely be that close up, but also (...) (26 years ago, 25-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
