Subject:
|
Re: i admit i was wrong
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Sat, 14 Aug 1999 17:46:40 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
lpieniazek@novera./nospam/com
|
Viewed:
|
1010 times
|
| |
|
|
Tim,
You need to fix that bug in your poster SW that is not referencing quite
correctly! :-) I keep having trouble finding your replies. Well, found
it so here I am.
To net it out, I agree with you, mostly, on this. (and I tend to think
of you and Bram as adults, BTW(1) )
The question is, is there anything salvagable? If there is (and it's not
my call, it's the cad.dev regulars, I'm just a gadfly), is the time and
effort likely to pay off? If the judgement is, "maybe" (and again, not
my call, it's the call of whoever volunteers to take on the
"babysitting") then I think drawing sets is more likely to be value add
to the community sooner than several other activities I can think of.
That's all I'm saying there. Based on your offline note to me I sort of
think you already agree.
1 - Mookie was making an age based distinction(2), I tend to go on
maturity level. Except when you were slamming me in the great "blue
windows" /"hoarding connections to TLG" flamefest, ( :-) ) I tend to
think of you as adult. Adultness is not a function of age, it's a
function of behaviour.
2 - valid and I know she agrees with me, she was just making a point
that we're all adults, or mostly adults, here on LUGNET. (3) You guys
count.
3 - for now. Going forward the mix will change according to Todd. We
need to work some of these mentoring/behaviour/monitoring things out now
before things get more hectic.
Tim Courtney wrote:
>
> At 10:17 PM 8/13/99 , Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> > Tim Courtney wrote:
> >
> > > I'd say not. I'm looking more for things along the lines of gathering
> > > links, making sure stuff works, making pages which are not
> > > content-critical. LDrawing sets in large volume is nice, but its not
> > > something considered 'giving someone an appreciation for the place' IMO.
> >
> > Why not? I think that Ldrawing sets is indeed useful. But then, my
> > perspective is that of a consumer of instructions, not a creator of
> > them, and I certainly know that I do not have the time nor the interest
> > to get deep into part creation. I am grateful that there are those who
> > do. It is a tough job and it takes a lot of skill.
>
> LDrawing sets is useful, I'm not disagreeing. But the thing is Jonathan
> has stockpiled bunches and bunches of these LDrawn sets and will just
> submit a flood of them without editing out his own 'parts' first. I'm more
> concerned with adhesion to the OMR standards.
>
> > But I trust they will not tell me how to architect distributed systems,
> > just as I would not presume to tell them how to do parts. I may vote on
> > how the parts look to me, just as I welcome their input on how the
> > systems I architect perform.
>
> Correct.
>
> > But anyway, if there is something that benefits the community as a whole
> > (not specifically ldraw.org) that Jonathan is good at, and from which a
> > more constructive interaction might result than if it were something
> > Jonathan was NOT good at, it seems worth a try to this outsider.
>
> I was just using ldraw.org as a suggestion. But yes, there are other
> things that would benefit the community outside of doing stuff for ldraw.org.
>
> > A few ground rules if I may be so bold:
> > - no asking for parts. Do the sets you have the parts for only.
> > - no using non standard parts. Not even as mockups.
> > - if it doesn't display correctly on a system that has all, and only,
> > the official released parts, it's wrong.
>
> Good thoughts.
>
> -Tim <><
>
> http://www.zacktron.com
> http://www.ldraw.org
> AIM: timcourtne
> ICQ: 23951114
>
> Commonwealth Edison: What do you do with OUR power?
>
> Get paid to surf the web! Visit:
> http://www.alladvantage.com/go.asp?refid=DGO655
--
Larry Pieniazek larryp@novera.com http://my.voyager.net/lar
- - - Web Application Integration! http://www.novera.com
fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ Member ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to
lugnet.
NOTE: I have left CTP, effective 18 June 99, and my CTP email
will not work after then. Please switch to my Novera ID.
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: i admit i was wrong
|
| (...) Same here, I probably should have said that a little more clearly :) (...) That's what I meant when I said that.. if no one would have ever told me that Tim wasn't an "adult" a never would have guessed otherwise, Same with Bram, though I don't (...) (25 years ago, 14-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | Re: i admit i was wrong
|
| (...) <puffs his chest out with pride> ;) (...) I couldn't agree more. One, I'm definitely not a parent :) and Two, I'm a teenager and am annoyed to death of (little) kids (c'mon, we've all been there). Now obviously, Jonathan isn't a *little* kid. (...) (25 years ago, 15-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: i admit i was wrong
|
| (...) LDrawing sets is useful, I'm not disagreeing. But the thing is Jonathan has stockpiled bunches and bunches of these LDrawn sets and will just submit a flood of them without editing out his own 'parts' first. I'm more concerned with adhesion to (...) (25 years ago, 14-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general)
|
146 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
