 | | Re: DAT voting page up —Chris Dee
|
| | | (...) A big update - and welcome to some new names - great work. I have some comments on the new parts: Airport Runway baseplates (606p33, 608p33) and Crosswalk Baseplate (425p01) These appear to have been authored by concurrently defining the white (...) (26 years ago, 23-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: DAT voting page up —Jonathan Wilson
|
| | | | | (...) These are mine. i have not had any rendering problems so tell me the positon and size of the problem. (...) i was not aware of this... thanks for the tip. (...) That was probobly my fault... but does it really matter? (...) does it really (...) (26 years ago, 23-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: DAT voting page up —Chris Dee
|
| | | | | | | (...) Just view them in LDraw (Over left front) at 50% and you should see (they do render OK in LDLite). Basically what has been done in the past is to redefine the entire part, missing out (fromn the colour 16 definitions) the area of surface which (...) (26 years ago, 23-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: DAT voting page up —John VanZwieten
|
| | | | | | | | Chris Dee wrote in message ... (...) (425p01) (...) do (...) redefine (...) with, (...) An example: Adding a white rectangle to a color 16 surface: 1. Delete the color 16 surface from the part. 2. Add the white rectangle. 3. Fill in the area around (...) (26 years ago, 24-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: DAT voting page up —Bram Lambrecht
|
| | | | | | | (...) Wait, isn't pink one of the 16 defined LDraw colors? I t doesn't need to be dithered. From ldraw.doc: ... 9 Light Blue 10 Light Green 11 Cyan 12 Light Red 13 Pink <-- LDraw color #13 14 Yellow 15 White ... Or is this pink a different shade (...) (26 years ago, 24-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: DAT voting page up —Jonathan Wilson
|
| | | | | | | | check out belvill set 5845. the jetski has a part that has a pink body and light pink triangles. (26 years ago, 24-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: DAT voting page up —Terry Keller
|
| | | | | | | (...) You bet it does. (...) See above. -- Terry K -- (26 years ago, 24-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: DAT voting page up —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | | (...) Yes, very much. (...) Y,VM. Steve (26 years ago, 24-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: DAT voting page up —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | (...) It seems to be molded as two parts which have been glued or welded. I'm not going to pry mine apart to find a second number. If there is a different official number for this part, our standard would be to use that number.[1] (...) You mean the (...) (26 years ago, 24-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: DAT voting page up —John VanZwieten
|
| | | | (...) tag? (...) You might be right about this one. It's a small part with rather oddly rounded surfaces. I'll take another look at it. (...) OK, and I'll also implement the use of sub-parts to separate the front face. If anyone has the triangle (...) (26 years ago, 24-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
