 | | Re: [PARTS] - Header keyword line
|
|
(...) None that I know of. If we can all agree on a general definition of these two meta-commands, I will add support for them to LDAO. My current definition for the meta-commands are (note: I've violated at least some of these rules): 0 CATEGORY (...) (26 years ago, 19-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: [PARTS] - Header keyword line
|
|
(...) I'll try. I haven't looked through my L-CAD archive so the answers will be slightly vague. (...) None that I know of, but I expect it to be added to the parts searcher soon. (...) I think CATEGORY was intended for things that belonged in (...) (26 years ago, 19-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | LDAO eating header comments
|
|
Hey Steve, i've noticed over the last couple of days, while modeling all these wheels/tires that LDAO is doing something evil to my header lines... my max2dat export proggy automatically puts these lines in after the standard part/filename/author (...) (26 years ago, 19-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | [PARTS] - Header keyword line
|
|
Hello all, I'm thinking of adding a keywords line to my (updated) part files, but I don't know much about the functionality of this feature. A look in the FAQ didn't help me either. Could someone answer these questions I have ? 1. What programs use (...) (26 years ago, 19-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Any hope for LDLite and MPD together?
|
|
(...) Oops, sorry. Didn't read your post closely enough... Steve (26 years ago, 18-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Any hope for LDLite and MPD together?
|
|
Steve Bliss wrote in message <36cc614e.2128629@lu...et.com>... (...) was (...) Why not Mac users? If LDLite was on the LUGNET server, it could just send the output as a .gif file or such. It would be slower, of course, but wouldn't require a local (...) (26 years ago, 18-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Any hope for LDLite and MPD together?
|
|
(...) Except Mac users... Steve (26 years ago, 18-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Any hope for LDLite and MPD together?
|
|
Paul, do you have plans to make LDLite compatable with the MPD format? I was reminded of this by the tyre posts to lugnet.cad. I think this would be a major improvement as far as the usefulness of lugnet.cad.dat. Of course the other major (...) (26 years ago, 18-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | [makelist] - Re: mklist v1.0 ready for testing
|
|
Hello Lars, I've been able to run mklist.exe on my MS-DOS 6.2 based machine at home, and also on a Windows NT 4.00 based machine at work. Your program works fine on both of them. If you are able to make it sub-sort the identical descriptions on (...) (26 years ago, 18-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts Maintenance Idea
|
|
(...) I can speak on this. Japan uses either y-d-m or d-m-y in modern forms. Traditionally (and still in some traditional circles) the Year is expressed in reference to the current ruling emperor, so the year that I was there (1996) was actually (...) (26 years ago, 18-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts Maintenance Idea
|
|
Benoit: (...) I have always believed that Japan uses a year-month-day date format. Are you sure? Play well, Jacob ---...--- -- E-mail: sparre@nbi.dk -- -- Web...: <URL:(URL) -- ---...--- LDraw FAQ: <URL:(URL) (26 years ago, 18-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: castle parts
|
|
i mean the one used in knights castle where the face grille can't be moved. it has a single plume in the top. and vertical bars over the face area. (26 years ago, 18-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts Maintenance Idea
|
|
(...) Here, XXXX was to represent 6645 <blush>. (...) (26 years ago, 18-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: castle parts
|
|
Yes, the spear should be in the next vote. The arrow quiver is in my to do bag, but it's not top priority. -John Van Chris Dee wrote in message ... (...) (26 years ago, 17-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts Maintenance Idea
|
|
(...) In lugnet.cad.dev, chris_w_dee@hotmail.com (Chris Dee) writes: (...) They are quite different. I didn't know that both had the same number, though. CHRIS: Are you certain that the housing from set XXXX has 2578 molded into it? The original, (...) (26 years ago, 17-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw and the Track Designer (Was: Next show)
|
|
(...) Duh, yes. 11.25 is just wishful thinking. Never mind. Well one teeny downside to your switch proposal is the new geometries that would result. worth it though, to be free from the tyranny the current geometry imposes. (26 years ago, 17-Feb-99, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Still getting cad.dev through e-mail
|
|
Todd, Last week, I unsubscribed myself from all the groups in favor of getting them via nntp. The e-mail subscription page indicates that I am not subscribed to any groups now. However, I still seem to be getting lugnet.cad.dev by e-mail. What can I (...) (26 years ago, 17-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw and the Track Designer (Was: Next show)
|
|
(...) No, curves are 22.5 degrees. If you give Track Designer bitmaps at 0, 22.5, 45 and 67.5 degrees it can generate all the other possible rotations. However, the existing registry only has track at all these rotations, road plates, monorail[1] (...) (26 years ago, 17-Feb-99, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: castle parts
|
|
(...) Most of these are on my todo list, esp. helmet, torsos and saddle, but I've resisted bagging them on the parts tracker until I actually start work. There are several non-modelled helmets - do you mean the one with the vertical bars across the (...) (26 years ago, 17-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts Maintenance Idea
|
|
(...) Since Japan uses y-d-m, then the TLA month would be better. Steve (26 years ago, 17-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
