 | | Re: Status of SW Ion Cannon?
|
|
(...) Ah, cool. I hadn't noticed that application. Kind of wobbly, but it works. (...) I'm sure your meas-timates are at least as good as mine, so it's not worth re-doing all of your work. (...) That's how I would have done it. Not much fun. (...) (...) (26 years ago, 19-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Status of SW Ion Cannon?
|
|
Steve Bliss wrote in message <371a91f5.3600445@lu...et.com>... (...) Excellent, then I think the gap in the bottom should be drawn. I could be used to mount the cannon on an antenna or other 8 ldu width rod. (...) I meas-timated the radii as 4.5 (...) (26 years ago, 19-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: [Newpart] - #2871, Electric Train 9V Motor Decorative Side
|
|
-----Original message----- From: jonathan wilson <wilsonj@xoommail.com> To: lugnet.cad@lugnet.com <lugnet.cad@lugnet.com>; lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com <lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com> Date: zaterdag 17 april 1999 1:18 Subject: Re: [Newpart] - #2871, (...) (26 years ago, 19-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | RE: [ldraw.org] L3P Question
|
|
Terry Keller wrote on Saturday, April 17, 1999: (...) Well, it tells you the extent and position of the model, which I find indispensable when trying to place several models in a scene. /Lars (26 years ago, 19-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | RE: Status of SW Ion Cannon?
|
|
John VanZwieten wrote on Saturday, April 17, 1999: (...) I (...) the (...) All 3 cone primitives (4-4con12.dat, 1-4con3.dat, 1-4con4.dat) have POV equivalents in L3P. Unfortunately in v1.1 the 1-4 cones are clipped by a too small box, (...) (26 years ago, 19-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Status of SW Ion Cannon?
|
|
(...) I believe the newest L3P is totally up-to-date on primitive substitutions, but the previous did not substitute all cones. BTW, which cones did you use? I meas-timated the radii as 5 and 9, so the existing conic primitives don't fit very well. (...) (26 years ago, 19-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Minifig torso subpart (was suggestion for roadplate like parts)
|
|
(...) And I will take care of the back-sides as well. Chris, is it OK with you if I finish the detailing of the two torsos (dungarees and BT2, I think) that reference 9326.dat, instead of 9326-4t.dat? They both need to have the undecorated surface (...) (26 years ago, 19-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: lugnet.cad hierarhcy
|
|
(...) I know it is, and I thought I already knew your answer. I just wanted to let you know I wasn't trying to be pushy, or expect something for nothing. Steve (26 years ago, 19-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Minifig torso subpart (was suggestion for roadplate like parts)
|
|
(...) Chris, Steve Bliss has volunteered to do all the labor. :-) -- Terry K -- (26 years ago, 18-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Minifig torso subpart (was suggestion for roadplate like parts)
|
|
(...) Yes, I agree, but this will mean more work to change the existing decorated torsos - adding three extra quads as well as changing the call to 9326-4t.dat and changing that subpart. I can do this, but it will take a little time - is that OK? (...) (26 years ago, 17-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
