Subject:
|
Re: LDraw part library structure
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Sat, 17 Apr 1999 01:42:15 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
790 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, dulcaoin@alumni.cse.ucsc.edu (Joshua Delahunty) writes:
> [...]
> > But seriously, I would like to express my thanks to Joshua Delahunty
> > for all his brainstorming and hard work on formulating these standards.
> > His ideas for using underscore categories and the xxxxCyy formatting
> > for composites was pivotal. Although initially, I had my doubts.
>
> Initially, ha! (I had to hit him with a wiffle bat repeatedly, folks)
> <g>
I've been hit numerous times (upside the head, base of the neck, whammo to
the ear, flat across the noggin, and more) by Joshua's wiffle bat over the
past *5* years -- and I feel all the smarter for it.
I've got my own bat, of course, for when we slug it out, but in the end,
it's Joshua who is almost always right, especially when it comes to systems
of categorization and other AR/OC details. :)
--Todd
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: LDraw part library structure
|
| (...) You have been wiffling with him longer than I. I am _slowly_ learning that it is usually pointless to argue with Joshua over these subjects. Might need a few more bonks, though. :-) -- Terry K -- (25 years ago, 17-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: LDraw part library structure
|
| (...) You're welcome, Terry. A labor of love, it was. <big snip> (...) Don't even worry about this, Terry. Either we're going to have a 5-digit code for the entire assembly that we can use, or we're going to know the 4-digit codes even if they're (...) (25 years ago, 15-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
