Subject:
|
Re: New LDAO - Temp Location
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Fri, 16 Apr 1999 03:50:43 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
936 times
|
| |
|
|
I could give it a shot. Why not.
Don't shoot me if I don't remember to do it. :-)
But I will add it to the checklist.
-- Terry K --
Guess I better actually _look_ at the date touching utility now.
On Thu, 15 Apr 1999 14:20:14 GMT, "John VanZwieten"
<john_vanzwieten@email.msn.com> wrote:
> Ooh, I like it! Would you do a separate date for the voting files?
>
> -John Van
>
> Terry K wrote in message <371537a8.6603130@lugnet.com>...
> > That is what I was thinking. I was looking for a good multi-file find and
> > replace (got one) and came across a utility to set times and dates. I • thought
> > it might be useful in some way to be able to do that.
> >
> > Maybe set the time to reflect the update number, and the date for the date of
> > release.
> >
> > -- Terry K --
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 14 Apr 1999 14:53:28 GMT, "John VanZwieten"
> > <john_vanzwieten@email.msn.com> wrote:
> >
> > > If it wouldn't be much trouble, that would be nice. It would help us part
> > > authors distinguish between the version released in the update and any • version
> > > we have floating around our hard-drive. I just had a situation where I
> > > accidently unziped the parts voting file into my /parts directory instead of
> > > the parts update. If they all had the same date stamp it would have been • easy
> > > to extract them.
> > >
> > > Not a big deal, but if it's easy to do...
> > >
> > > -John Van
> > >
> > > Terry K wrote in message <37147609.10517285@lugnet.com>...
> > > > On Tue, 13 Apr 1999 14:09:05 GMT, blisses@worldnet.att.net (Steve Bliss) • wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Tue, 13 Apr 1999 09:05:26 GMT, legoverse@geocities.com (Terry K) wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Wow. Lots of little things fixed. Big THANKS.
> > > > >
> > > > > You're welcome.
> > > > >
> > > > > Three things to be aware of in this release:
> > > > >
> > > > > 1. The VEC opens really slowly the first time you access it in any session
> > > > > of LDAO. This is because ldraw\parts is being checked to make sure there
> > > > > aren't any part-files newer than parts.lst. But there is an internal • flag,
> > > > > so after checking one time (in a single run of LDAO), it doesn't check
> > > > > again.
> > > > >
> > > > > I hope in the next version, I will have a File | New Window option in the
> > > > > VEC, so additional VEC windows can be opened more quickly.
> > > > >
> > > > > 2. The 0 CATEGORY keyword is still not being referenced because the simple
> > > > > way to check it (read all part-files while loading the VEC) would take too
> > > > > long. I should have this implemented in the *next* version, which should
> > > > > be at least a .1 increment, instead of a .0.1 increment.
> > > > >
> > > > > 3. While there is a date-check on parts.lst vs. ldraw\parts\, there is not
> > > > > a check of ldraw\parts\ vs. ldraw\vec\. So if your VEC images are
> > > > > out-of-date, you will need to remember to MakeCatalog.
> > > > >
> > > > > Steve
> > > >
> > > > OK. Umm, a question. Would it serve any useful purpose if I syncronized • all
> > > > the time/date stamps of the files in the updates?
> > > >
> > > > -- Terry K --
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: New LDAO - Temp Location
|
| Ooh, I like it! Would you do a separate date for the voting files? -John Van Terry K wrote in message <371537a8.6603130@lu...et.com>... (...) thought (...) version (...) easy (...) flag, (...) all (...) (26 years ago, 15-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
