Subject:
|
Re: Dimensions of the parts
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Tue, 13 Apr 1999 02:46:48 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
828 times
|
| |
|
|
Sproaticus wrote:
>
> > - Just don't include equality (=) in your collision test! (?)
> > BTW, what is the minimum increment you can move/turn a piece?
>
> This seems to me to be the best idea. Allow planes on the surface of the
> pieces to share the same space, but not the interiors of the same pieces.
But how can the program know if a face from a piece is inside another
piece ? I've been only testing for intersections between faces.
Leonardo
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Dimensions of the parts
|
| Leonardo Zide skrev i meddelandet <3712B018.76665708@c...com.br>... (...) another (...) If any two corners of a (planar) face, from one brick, is on opposite sides of a (planar) face of the other brick, they must be intersecting (not completely (...) (26 years ago, 13-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Dimensions of the parts
|
| (...) These only work for convex pieces. The hollow areas in a concave piece would not be handled properly, since at least one wall would actually move *closer* to the other piece. For example, consider a clip. If you scale its position by 1.01, the (...) (26 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
