To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / 10089
10088  |  10090
Subject: 
Re: Cross platform GUI
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.off-topic.geek
Date: 
Mon, 24 Jan 2005 18:23:06 GMT
Viewed: 
6097 times
  
   Personally I don't think using GTK under Windows is a good idea. I've
worked with it before and even released an application that used it and
you won't believe the amount of people that have trouble using a Windows
application with controls that don't look like the native ones.

   IMO Qt looks better under both Windows and Linux (it uses the native
Windows widgets) but it adds an extra pre processor step that makes your
compile times unacceptable. It's been a while since I last tried it so
things could be better now.

   I've heard good things about wxwidgets but never tried it myself,
maybe it's worth taking a look.

Leonardo



Orion Pobursky wrote:
Well I'm kind of of pissed.

** begin rant **

Curious to find an acceptible substitute for Java, I was looking into cross
platform GUI toolkits.  GTK+ came to mind but alas no Mac support for the latest
version.  Then I thought of Qt.  I visited the Qt website, read over their
overview and got excited.  Finally I found what I wanted so I clicked the
download link and was whisk to the download page only to discover that the
Windows version of the toolkit is not available under a open source licence but
the X11 and Mac OS X versions are.  They list no justification for this anywhere
on their website.  I suspect this this is open source snobbery at it's finest:
"let's punish the Windows users by making them pay $1000+ to develop using our
produst but give the Linux users a free ride"

** end rant **

Luckly I just ordered a Mac mini so I'll be able to try my hand but I still
won't be able to compile anything I create on Windows unless I'm willing to fork
over some cash (which I am not).

FUT to o-t.geek

-Orion





Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Cross platform GUI
 
(...) The look and feel is one of the reasons why I rejected GTK (...) To me, compile times are a non issue. However the non-free nature of Qt leaves a bad taste in my mouth (and I not even a Open Source zealot). I can however develop a Qt based (...) (20 years ago, 25-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.off-topic.geek)

Message is in Reply To:
  Cross platform GUI
 
Well I'm kind of of pissed. ** begin rant ** Curious to find an acceptible substitute for Java, I was looking into cross platform GUI toolkits. GTK+ came to mind but alas no Mac support for the latest version. Then I thought of Qt. I visited the Qt (...) (20 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.off-topic.geek)

9 Messages in This Thread:





Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR