 | | Re: Change to existing policy regarding the subfiling of dithered colors
|
|
(...) To be honest, I suspect that if you aren't a hard-core reviewer, you're probably not holding anything due to dithering. Maybe I'm just being cynical, though. --Travis Cobbs (20 years ago, 4-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Change to existing policy regarding the subfiling of dithered colors
|
|
(...) Hard core reviewers know this already, of course, but those of us who don't review as much can use this link (URL) to find reviews they've done, including all the holds, so they can see if they are holding anything for dithering... (20 years ago, 4-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Change to existing policy regarding the subfiling of dithered colors
|
|
(...) See? Wasn't that easy? :) Steve (20 years ago, 4-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Change to existing policy regarding the subfiling of dithered colors
|
|
I'll resubmit the part unchanged, if your hold vote is not deleted by midnight CET... (URL) (20 years ago, 4-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Change to existing policy regarding the subfiling of dithered colors
|
|
(...) Just to be clear - you do not have to make a subpart of the pattern; that's the change in policy. Steve (20 years ago, 4-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Change to existing policy regarding the subfiling of dithered colors
|
|
yes, mine: (URL) I guess I'll have to go through the hassle of re-submitting this and on the way make a subpart of the pattern.... *sigh* :) thx! (20 years ago, 4-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Change to existing policy regarding the subfiling of dithered colors
|
|
(...) Resubmitting (unchanged) files to simply clear away holds is *not* an approved practice for the PT. I'm not saying it isn't justified in this case, but it's not generally the way to operate - it undermines the the system. The more appropriate (...) (20 years ago, 4-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Flexible axles with lsynth
|
|
(...) My experience with lsynth is limited, so I'l defer to Kevin Clague on the above. (...) You could try LDraw Design Pad's flexible object generator. You can find LDDP at: (URL) (20 years ago, 4-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Change to existing policy regarding the subfiling of dithered colors
|
|
(...) Are there any holds based on this? Presumably we can just resubmit these parts to reset the votes. -Orion (20 years ago, 4-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Change to existing policy regarding the subfiling of dithered colors
|
|
(...) It's a change to the acceptance criteria for the official library, which is somewhat stricter than the file spec. For example, 0 WRITE meta commands are legal in regular LDraw files but not in official library parts. -Orion (20 years ago, 4-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Change to existing policy regarding the subfiling of dithered colors
|
|
Question: what to do with 'hold' votes based upon the old policy? Good work! Jan Folkersma (20 years ago, 4-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Flexible axles with lsynth [DAT]
|
|
Hello, I am currently unable to create flexible axles using lsynth and end piece LS40. I was wondering if anyone has been able to achieve this. This is the code that will not work with end part LS40 – 0 Untitled 0 Name: flex_axle.ldr 0 Author: MLCad (...) (20 years ago, 4-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Change to existing policy regarding the subfiling of dithered colors
|
|
(...) I'm confused. Is this a change to the current LDraw.org file specifications (which I thought was 0.23) or part of the next LDraw.org file spec (which I thought was going to be 1.0)? The spec published on LDraw.org (URL) is not numbered at all) (...) (20 years ago, 4-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Change to existing policy regarding the subfiling of dithered colors
|
|
LSC has decided to do away with the requirement to transfer dithered color elements to dedicated subfiles. This was required due to a limitation in the original LDRAW.EXE. Due to the belief that James would have eventually fixed this problem and the (...) (20 years ago, 3-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: MPD Wizard 1.0b
|
|
(...) I hate to say that the MPD Update feature has some bugs. It works but it leaves orphan files. -Orion (20 years ago, 2-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: MPD Wizard 1.0b
|
|
(...) I've updated my MPD program. Thanks for the feedback so far. Most notable is the MPD update feature. This feature strips an MPD of unoffical files made official (based on user input if prompting is selected). I also updated the interface a (...) (20 years ago, 2-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: MPD Wizard 1.0b
|
|
(...) Yeah I though about that after the fact. I probably would have GPL'd the source anyway. -Orion (20 years ago, 31-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: MPD Wizard 1.0b
|
|
(...) I hesitate to even mention it, but I thought it was only fair. Thanks for GPL'ing MPD Wizard, but if you are the original author of the LDDP code, I'm 99% sure you didn't have to do so. Even after you release something under GPL, you still own (...) (20 years ago, 30-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: MPD Wizard 1.0b
|
|
(...) That's a great suggestion. It gives me something to work on when I fly back home on Thursday. -Orion (20 years ago, 29-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: MPD Wizard 1.0b
|
|
(...) Yes, as I didn't try to change it on the fly ;o) An optimisation that could be done would be to remove one of the two spaces before subfile names. To make MPDWizard the Swiss army knife of MPD, you could add a "Test MPD" function that would (...) (20 years ago, 28-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
