 | | Re: Another PT Suggestion
|
|
(...) Try something like that: (URL) (22 years ago, 1-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Classic Space Flag
|
|
(...) Likewise. But the odd thing is, I have two Beta-1 Command Base sets, and I own exactly zero such flags. Can anyone shed some light on this interesting question? XFUT to .general, naturally. LFB (22 years ago, 1-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | MOTM and SOTM winners for June 2002
|
|
I'm actually up to speed on this one. :-) The Winner of LDraw.org's Model Of The Month is: Sven Moritz Hein and his spot-on version of a classic 911 sportscar. Wow. Sven has a load of goodies to see on his webpage, and on Brickshelf - check it out. (...) (22 years ago, 1-Jul-02, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw) !
|
| |
| | Re: PT Author question
|
|
(...) Generally, I'd let the author of the fix handle it. But yeah, fixes to fixes are ok. (...) If you've tried to contact the author without a response, then it's ok to fix an official part. Steve (22 years ago, 30-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Classic Space Flag
|
|
(...) The only set that had this part was 6970 Beta-1 Command Base. I looked up the instructions for this set on Brickshelf and the flag seems to be completely missing from the instructions. I would surmise, based on other sets from the same time, (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Classic Space Flag
|
|
See: (URL) this part exist as a decorated/patterned element? Or was the flag-pattern strictly a sticker? Steve (22 years ago, 30-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | PT Author question
|
|
This is actually a double question: 1. For parts on the PT that are fixes of existing parts, it's it considered okay to upload a new version of the part, fixing any errors or hold vote comments that my exist? 2. What about for original parts if the (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: PT Suggestion
|
|
"Steve Bliss" <partsref@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:GyICs1.3o2@lugnet.com... (...) it (...) be (...) It's more complicated to program, but wouldn't it be an idea to show the next part that is similar to the one you've just looked at? Eg. you (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: PT Suggestion
|
|
(...) I've been thinking more about this, I'm not sure what a good "next" would be. The current (URL) queue page> works on sort of the current data. Posting a review upsets that sort, so it's hard to say "give me the next file after the one I just (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: PT Suggestion
|
|
(...) Define "next" in this context. With a good definition of "next" I think it would be great... (22 years ago, 30-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | PT Suggestion
|
|
Dan mentioned an idea to me, but he's letting me post about it. Probably because I was the one who wanted to see what other people think. On the review results page (you know, the little page that says you posted a review successfully), would be (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Another PT Suggestion
|
|
(...) Good idea. I was working on something like this, a way to search the activity log, but I got distracted. Steve (22 years ago, 30-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Another PT Suggestion
|
|
I'd like to see a Parts I've Submitted page. This way I can keep track of what I've submitted and respond to comments quicker. -Orion (22 years ago, 29-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Part Voting Issue
|
|
(...) By "hack", I just meant that someone could view the message page, save the HTML source to their hard drive, and modify the fields in the form to allow them to input userid and subject line. In order to use this hacked form, they'd still need (...) (22 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Part Voting Issue
|
|
(...) Sounds good to me. If someone does hack it, we need to get it reported. Then we can disable it for awhile. Paul (22 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Part Voting Issue
|
|
(...) Yes, we would not display the destination email address, just the destination Parts Tracker userid. Good idea on the fixed subject line. Although it wouldn't be hard to hack the form, if the locking is just enforced by the HTML code. Steve (22 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: are you sure?
|
|
(...) That works for me. Steve (22 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Part Voting Issue
|
|
(...) I'd definitely want the destination address locked, probably not even displayed (just the name / user code), and a fixed subject line, too eg "Review of part xxxx", to disuade people from using it for anything other than PT email. ROSCO (22 years ago, 26-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Part Voting Issue
|
|
(...) a (...) way (...) As a reviewer, I personally would not have a problem with this. Cheers, --Ryan Amateur radio call sign: kb1fob E-mail: ryanjf@ifriendly.com Website: (URL) (22 years ago, 26-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: disabling BFC (was "Head w/ Headset Over Brown Hair")
|
|
(...) Hey, that's pretty neat! You should get in touch with this LDraw.org I've heard about; you could be like an advisor or something... Thanks for your help! Dave! (22 years ago, 26-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
