 | | Re: Problems submitting upadeted versions of official parts?
|
|
(...) Hi Mark, Do NOT attempt to directly submit updated parts using your userid! Do NOT change part number to force submission! This would result in more work for the administrator. May be he would resent you. Do not press him. Nothing urgent. Be (...) (22 years ago, 26-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Problems submitting upadeted versions of official parts?
|
|
How do I go about submitting upadted versions of officail parts? I have sent a few to parts@ldraw.org, but have yet to see any of them appear on the tracker. Maybe they should have several people in charge of looking over parts submitted to this (...) (22 years ago, 26-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: old parts and getting officialized
|
|
(...) yea i bet half the ones i make now you guys would be like : NO WAY NOT HERE! but just for the heck of it, (URL) <~ go to parts but serously i devoted alot of time to parts, official lego ones but now.. uht uh no way (22 years ago, 26-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: old parts and getting officialized
|
|
(...) Hmm. I'm pretty sure those parts have not been looked at. (...) Email me at parts@ldraw.org. Tell me what you want your parts tracker userid and password to be. I'll get it set up. (...) Drat! Steve (22 years ago, 26-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | old parts and getting officialized
|
|
hey guys (steve, tim..) i gotta ask since ive been out of the group for like a year and a half, has any of my old parts ( (URL) ) been looked at / officialized yet? the ones i mostly have in mind are: the town suspention, (URL) 12 v motor, (URL) v (...) (22 years ago, 26-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: rebuttal...
|
|
Since I was appealed to in Franklin's email and post, I am adding my comments in reply to some of the posts here. Steve knows this, but it might not be public knowledge -- I do not get involved in the trenches when it comes to parts. Steve has (...) (22 years ago, 26-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Digging up an old thread (was: The geometry of minifigs)
|
|
(...) Note that it's probably not possible to make proper arms that are backwards compatible because of the hand placement on the ends. So we'd need to assign new id numbers to the arms... right? Either that or we break a few thousand files. It may (...) (22 years ago, 25-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: rebuttal...
|
|
(...) This is my second reply, covering some side points Franklin brought up. (...) Yes, that's true. There's one from January, two from February, and 12 from March. To be exact, there are 10 files which are currently waiting for admin review, and (...) (22 years ago, 25-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: [Parts Tracker] Re-numbering "Star Wars" patterns...
|
|
(...) The main reason for suspending review privileges is simplicity - I just pulled all privileges. I hope we'll get this worked out quickly, and get back on the road. I *definitely* do not want to lose Franklin as a contributor; he is too valuable (...) (22 years ago, 25-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: [Parts Tracker] Re-numbering "Star Wars" patterns...
|
|
(...) Please Steve, Motivate the suspension as a reviewer. Suspension as a submitter MAY be necessary to keep control. Suspension as a reviewer clearly ressembles a sanction. What posted review justifies this sanction? Best regards, Damien (22 years ago, 25-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
