 | | Re: Picayune request for LDLite
|
|
I don't know what color "Picayune" is, but try using "3". (*) I'll add to the wishlist a desire for more colors on the drop down menus. Right now it is LDRAW-compatible, but it would be nice to be able to override the numbers in the edit box. You (...) (26 years ago, 27-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Ld2vr: DAT to VRML converter
|
|
Hello! I'm proud to announce the version 1 of Ld2vr, a DAT to VRML converter. I also have some (4) VRML demos at (URL) With those demos, you can walk on the top of a stud, and feel the LEGO word under your feet. Or take a walk with a minifig, (...) (26 years ago, 27-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: vote 9902
|
|
(...) I think it's not bad at all, too, but I know it has no "feeling". I mean cultural content behind the words. "Negro" means nothing bad to me, for example. Even we have a chocolate biscuit here in Turkey named as "Negro". But I've learned last (...) (26 years ago, 27-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: A solution to the part numbering problem? (Was: vote 9902)
|
|
And what about going a step more?..I mean creating a new subdirectory named like "shorts" for the shortcuts. If you think about it, you can see that we have much of them (minifig, hinges, turntables, suspensions, universal joint, wheel holders, (...) (26 years ago, 27-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: vote 9902
|
|
(...) AFAIK, the 7xxxx numbers are totally color-specific. That is not to say that we couldn't be surprised in the future and find an exception to that. Anything could happen. And yes, there are cases of a piece being release in 7xxxx format as well (...) (26 years ago, 27-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: vote 9902
|
|
No apologies are needed, Selçuk. I understand your objections, and wish there were an easy way of fixing them. And your English is very good, IMO. :-) -- Terry K -- (...) (26 years ago, 27-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw part update 9902
|
|
(...) Thanks to both of you. I apreciate the support. I am hoping to get the part issues resolved and the parts released as soon as possible. Hopefully, in an interim update before the next full one. -- Terry K -- (26 years ago, 27-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: parts DESPERATLY wanted (steve: please read)
|
|
i really want the helpiad and curved roadway so i can see how to properly make baseplates with curved patterns e.g. i am considering making (properly) the classic space landing pad and the outer ring of the helipad is the same size as the yellow (...) (26 years ago, 27-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: vote 9902
|
|
here is my thoughts on the part numbers... i know that the numver 7xxxx assigned to the harpoon for example refers specificly to the chromed version but if TLG releases it in say blue whos to say that they will not decide to use the same number? we (...) (26 years ago, 27-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: parts DESPERATLY wanted (steve: please read)
|
|
(...) Sure. They should be available in the next update. Until then, you can easily substitute available parts. (...) Nope. I don't have that part, so I can't model it. (...) Now there's an incentive. (...) A mess. (...) If I get some time, I will (...) (26 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Studs
|
|
I've been 'testing' the CyberMaster version of the Electric Touch Sensor in POV-Ray and noticed a few details: I don't know if the contacts of the studs where yellow in some time in the past, but nowadays they are silver. Maybe they could should be (...) (26 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: New Touch Sensor [DAT]
|
|
-----Original message----- From: Laurentino Martins <lau@mail.telepac.pt> To: lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com <lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com> Date: vrijdag 26 maart 1999 15:40 subject: Re: New Touch Sensor I've noticed I've made a mistake, the line in file (...) (26 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: New Touch Sensor [DAT]
|
|
-----Original message----- From: Laurentino Martins <lau@mail.telepac.pt> To: lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com <lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com> Date: vrijdag 26 maart 1999 15:40 subject: Re: New Touch Sensor (...) This is a known problem with dithered colours: (...) (26 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: A solution to the part numbering problem? (Was: vote 9902)
|
|
-----Original message----- From: Selçuk <teyyareci> <sgore@nospam.superonline.com> To: lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com <lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com> Datum: vrijdag 26 maart 1999 16:12 Onderwerp: Re: A solution to the part numbering problem? (Was: vote 9902) (...) (26 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Complete list of metacommands?
|
|
I am trying to get a complete list of the type 0 metacommands and this is what I currently have, if people can let me know the ones that I am missing that would be fantastic. Standard LDraw metacommands (see (URL) STEP - Marks the end of the (...) (26 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: problem with JJ Memorial
|
|
(...) I've maintained a local copy of the original archives on my mirror for the l-cad parts updates for a long time now. (URL) yesterday morning with the new 9902 update and the new complete.exe (26 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: parts DESPERATLY wanted (steve: please read)
|
|
(...) When my kinfolk (1) try this trick on me, they very quickly find themselves in a different room (or if I can help it, a different building) from where I am. They have learned that this tactic of begging brings exactly the opposite of what they (...) (26 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw part update 9902
|
|
(...) I agree, and I also want to extend a Thank You to Todd, Terry, Steve, Leo and others too numerous to mention for their generous contributions to the LEGO community. It is frusterating sometimes to have to wait for the latest update in any (...) (26 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: A solution to the part numbering problem? (Was: vote 9902)
|
|
Wow...How nice. I really like this idea. I have been always behind the idea of separating those two universe, but couldn't realise that they could be both "separate" and "together" at the same time. Nice and elegant solution in my side. What's you (...) (26 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: vote 9902
|
|
Terrel, I'm sorry that I forgotten to mention in my last message, but if has any use for anyone (from misunderstanding point of view) I never intended to blame anyone, especially you. I believe you have the one having one of the greatest portions (...) (26 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
