 | | Re: MPD Question...
|
|
(...) I *suppose* it should not rely on it. But it would be a good first indicator. Steve (26 years ago, 22-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: MPD Question...
|
|
LDLite currently does not rely on the filename for anything. But if it could use the extension to tell .dat and .mpd files apart, that would help. Should it? -gyug (...) (26 years ago, 21-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: part naming ideas
|
|
(...) or "ResQ chainsaw body", or "Race pneumatic hammer body"? (...) "Town Flashlight"? (...) "Ninja Flying platform handlebars"? (...) "Town Camcorder"? (...) "Paradisa beachcomber metal detector"? Perhaps theme groupings are very useful. -gyug (26 years ago, 21-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: part naming ideas
|
|
(...) How about "Minifig Accessory"? (26 years ago, 21-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | L3P + L3GO - rumor or fact?
|
|
Is it true that L3P will now use L3GO bricks where available? If so, where should the L3GO part files be placed? I ask because of my quest for perfection on a perfectly-rendered Galaxy Explorer, and those sloped cones are just God-awful ugly right (...) (26 years ago, 20-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | part numbers wanted
|
|
i am looking for part numbers for the folowing... (all names taken form the technic element registry: (URL) chain page sprocket connectors page ball joint with peg ball joint with 1 x 1 round plate catch cross gears page knob wheel clutch, 24T rack (...) (26 years ago, 21-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: part naming ideas
|
|
(...) for a while now i've thought it might be a good idea (i think i did it during a recategorization once) if all the minifig-related elements in the space category get moved to Minifig... and specifically Minifig Space would be a good category to (...) (26 years ago, 21-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: part naming ideas
|
|
(...) Should we start a sub-category "Minifig Castle" or "Minifig Weapon"? (...) Include size. (...) Include size. (...) plant tree round Steve (26 years ago, 21-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: MPD Question...
|
|
(...) And by default, LDraw files are not required to have the .dat extension -- it's just the default. Steve (26 years ago, 21-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: MPD Question...
|
|
(...) i'm a little unclear on this point, gyug... .MPD files have the same .DAT extension???? perhaps you mean when posting to LUGNET??? because all of the .MPD's i've DL'd from people's sites... and even MPD's built with my M-Peedy program have (...) (26 years ago, 20-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | wanted: Arne Hackstein's e-mail address
|
|
does anyone know Arne Hackstein's e-mail address? (26 years ago, 20-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | part naming ideas
|
|
here are some suggestions for the names of parts some are to make it easier to identify which part is being talked about... some are changes of category that are more logical because a part is not specific to one theme e.g. castle or space for (...) (26 years ago, 20-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: MPD Question...
|
|
(...) Well, here's my impression of the lastest discussion. (...) The first file in an MPD file is the one that gets drawn. (...) _valid_ leading lines are technically an error. There should be no lines before the first "0 FILE" except comment lines (...) (26 years ago, 20-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | MPD Question...
|
|
I searched through the archives of this group and could not find a definitive definition of the MPD format (there were several contradictory postings). So if someone can answer the following that would be great: 1) Which part is assumed to be the (...) (26 years ago, 19-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: M-Peedy page now up
|
|
(...) grrr...rrr... can jeff do *anything* right today???? here's the correct link: (thanks tore) (URL) -- / /----- ---- - ---- - -- | | | | | | | | | |- - | | | | | | ---- - ---- |---- - onyx@flash.net| | - (26 years ago, 18-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | M-Peedy page now up
|
|
M-Peedy is now up to .2 beta... it has checking/dialog boxes to prompt before overwriting the .MPD file you are creating, or any .DAT files it is extracting... DL it at: www.flash.net/~onyx/...peedy.html let me know what problems arise, and what you (...) (26 years ago, 18-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts
|
|
(...) If no one is into that effort already, yes it would be nice :-) The part is somewhat similar to the 3651 Technic Connector, but fits axles on both ends. Thanks! Laurentino Martins [mailto:lau@mail.telepac.pt] [(URL) (26 years ago, 18-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: M-Peedy version .1 beta
|
|
(...) .DAT (...) the (...) proggy (...) This is probably a good thing. If I have a model using unofficial parts, then to share it with the world as an .MPD, I would want the unofficial part to be added as a sub-model. Otherwise I'd have to inline (...) (26 years ago, 18-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts
|
|
(...) I posted the file as a follow-up to your request, but I did the Followup-to header incorrectly -- I pointed my reply to *just* lugnet.cad.dat, instead of *both* lugnet.cad and lugnet.cad.dat. My apologies. (...) Must be us part authors are (...) (26 years ago, 18-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Adriano Aicardi's e-mail address wanted
|
|
(...) From 3649.dat: 0 Author: Adriano Aicardi 1998 (ike@money.it) Don't know if this is still correct. Leonardo (26 years ago, 18-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
