Subject:
|
Re: MPD Question...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Sun, 21 Mar 1999 03:30:39 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
726 times
|
| |
|
|
On Sat, 20 Mar 1999 21:29:19 GMT, "onyx" <onyx@flash.net> wrote:
> In lugnet.cad.dev, Paul Gyugyi writes:
> > Unfortunately, MPD files have the same .dat extension as non-MPD files,
> > so there is no way for a tool to know in advance the file is an MPD.
>
> i'm a little unclear on this point, gyug... .MPD files have the same .DAT
> extension???? perhaps you mean when posting to LUGNET??? because all of the
> .MPD's i've DL'd from people's sites... and even MPD's built with my M-Peedy
> program have .MPD as their extension....
And by default, LDraw files are not required to have the .dat extension --
it's just the default.
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: MPD Question...
|
| LDLite currently does not rely on the filename for anything. But if it could use the extension to tell .dat and .mpd files apart, that would help. Should it? -gyug (...) (26 years ago, 21-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: MPD Question...
|
| (...) i'm a little unclear on this point, gyug... .MPD files have the same .DAT extension???? perhaps you mean when posting to LUGNET??? because all of the .MPD's i've DL'd from people's sites... and even MPD's built with my M-Peedy program have (...) (26 years ago, 20-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
