Subject:
|
Re: MPD Question...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Sun, 21 Mar 1999 19:03:24 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
784 times
|
| |
|
|
LDLite currently does not rely on the filename for anything.
But if it could use the extension to tell .dat and .mpd
files apart, that would help. Should it?
-gyug
Steve Bliss wrote:
>
> On Sat, 20 Mar 1999 21:29:19 GMT, "onyx" <onyx@flash.net> wrote:
>
> > In lugnet.cad.dev, Paul Gyugyi writes:
> > > Unfortunately, MPD files have the same .dat extension as non-MPD files,
> > > so there is no way for a tool to know in advance the file is an MPD.
> >
> > i'm a little unclear on this point, gyug... .MPD files have the same .DAT
> > extension???? perhaps you mean when posting to LUGNET??? because all of the
> > .MPD's i've DL'd from people's sites... and even MPD's built with my M-Peedy
> > program have .MPD as their extension....
>
> And by default, LDraw files are not required to have the .dat extension --
> it's just the default.
>
> Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: MPD Question...
|
| (...) And by default, LDraw files are not required to have the .dat extension -- it's just the default. Steve (26 years ago, 21-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
