 | | Re: How much is too much?
|
|
(...) basically the rule of thumb i try to stick with, is the basis for our point of origin primitive... the stud.. the standard LDraw stud uses a 16-segment cylinder... so whenever possible i try to use 16-sided cylinders anytime i'm dealing with a (...) (26 years ago, 18-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | How much is too much?
|
|
A short while ago Onyx produced a MAX2DAT converter which seemed like such a good idea I was inspired to look into converting from other text based formats. I chose VRML files to start with because they seemed very much alike to the DAT format. (...) (26 years ago, 18-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: small ufo saucer hulls
|
|
(...) whoa.. what an image that conjures up (stretching skin over the framework) wild, man ..joseph g (26 years ago, 17-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts
|
|
(...) (Was I expected to guess that someone have answered my mail in a different newsgroup?) I was not expecting that with so much people using LDraw not to find such common TECHNIC parts that that are available since last year (at least?). I know I (...) (26 years ago, 17-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts
|
|
(...) steve bliss posted this part to CAD.DAT earlier this week: (URL) (26 years ago, 17-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: [makelist] mklist v1.1
|
|
(...) Steve (26 years ago, 17-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Parts
|
|
I've posted this in lugnet.cad and nobody answered me, so I guessed I must have posted it in the wrong newsgroup... In LeoCAD I can't find some parts that are common in the newer TECHNIC sets. Is LeoCAD list complete or is outdated? I find very (...) (26 years ago, 17-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | RE: MPD format
|
|
Just to sum things up: Paul Gyugyi wrote (1): (...) and in another posting (2): (...) I think (1) and (2) are contradicting. I agree with (2). The functionality of (1) should be obtained with a META command. (...) Do we agree that valid drawing (...) (26 years ago, 17-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | RE: [makelist] mklist v1.0 ready for testing
|
|
(...) I have developed it on Windows 98, and tested it on NT 4.0 too. /Lars (26 years ago, 17-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: [makelist] mklist v1.0 ready for testing
|
|
BTW, I tried mklist under Windows 95, and it works fine. Has anyone tried it on Windows 98? Having a working makelist to include in a near-future parts update would be greate. Steve (...) (26 years ago, 17-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
