| | Re: BFC revisited
|
|
Gary Williams wrote... (...) Steve, please note that Gary pointed out that some parts are badly formatted... "l3p -check" doesn't complain, as "0 CERTIFY BFC CW" is a perfectly legal comment :-) I don't think l3p easily can be made to check this, "0 (...) (23 years ago, 19-Aug-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | Re: BFC revisited
|
|
(...) Cool! (...) will do. (...) I'm not understanding the problem. I've made versions of the sloping cylinders that are bfc-compliant. (...) Do you mean the problem (not just with sloped cylinders) that sometimes primitives are used for the outside (...) (23 years ago, 17-Aug-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | Re: Getting started: On Linux
|
|
Don: (...) :-) (...) Done. Jacob (23 years ago, 17-Aug-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
|
| | Re: Getting started: On Linux
|
|
(...) switching it to version 0_9_1d? That's probably going to be the current version for a while. It's got the part inliner and most of the goodies I wanted to add to the LEdit emulation mode. Anyways, I've stopped working on the LEdit mode for (...) (23 years ago, 17-Aug-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
|
| | Re: LDGLite bug report (yes, one more)
|
|
(...) I think it's gonna be a while before I can get organized enough to roll a new release, but this edge line option, as well as the camera and near/far clip plane controls, have been added to the sources if you want to try it out. You can get (...) (23 years ago, 17-Aug-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|