 | | Re: Correct attribution? (was Re: Parts tracker needs more visibility
|
|
(...) Yes. For starters, consider this. LDraw.org the organization belongs in with other organizations. LDraw the program ought to be parallel to MLCad and LEOCad and the other groups devoted to programs. ldraw/parts seems somehow wrong. Parts at (...) (24 years ago, 1-Nov-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Yet another L3PAO update
|
|
(...) :-) Good idea (must be, you're not the first ;-) with .DATs for camera object types, please see "Re: Follow up to Camera Tricks" in lugnet.cad /Lars (24 years ago, 1-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Yet another L3PAO update
|
|
(...) I was waiting for someone to push me to do that ;) Leave it to you to try and get me to be the best programmer I can be.. hehe (did you see my post about adding "camera" object types as .DATs and then having L3P use them for camera (...) (24 years ago, 1-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Yet another L3PAO update
|
|
(...) Well, seems like an easy task for a program too! Backwards compatibility is very nice (knock knock :-) /Lars (24 years ago, 31-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Correct attribution? (was Re: Parts tracker needs more visibility
|
|
(...) Start by reorganizing the lugnet.cad.* newsgroups. I realize that's not going to happen, but that would be the best place to start. (...) It is icky that stuff is duplicated, but it's not really clear where *parts* *development* stuff should (...) (24 years ago, 31-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Correct attribution? (was Re: Parts tracker needs more visibility
|
|
(...) Ah yes. The URL got updated once, but not the name after it. (...) Hmm, I dunno, I just copied what was in the /cad/ldraw/parts/ section. Anyone out there in CAD-land have any suggestions on how to improve the lists here?-- (URL) here-- (URL) (...) (24 years ago, 30-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: how to NAME patterned m/f faces for specific personas?...
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Manfred Moolhuysen wrote: [snip] I agree with Manfred. Generic description in the descriptive name, character name*s* in the KEYWORDS, and add more comment lines if necessary. Steve (24 years ago, 30-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: how to NAME patterned m/f faces for specific personas?...
|
|
(...) How about option d: Number them. "Star Wars Face Pattern 1", "Star Wars Face Pattern 2", etc. Then we wouldn't have to worry about it. Steve Bliss GDR implied (24 years ago, 30-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: how to NAME patterned m/f faces for specific personas?...
|
|
(...) [snip] (...) Here is my suggestion: In part description: Generic descriptive In a "0 KEYWORDS " line: "Star Wars" followed by the Specific character name(s) In plain "0 " comment lines: the long part japping about which was who in what year. (...) (24 years ago, 29-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | how to NAME patterned m/f faces for specific personas?...
|
|
Howdy! I've got a minor problem, and I'd like to hear your thoughts on it. As you may know, I recently encoded a few DAT files for some minifig head patterns, including some from the Star Wars theme. In the past, the NAME we'd give a DAT file for a (...) (24 years ago, 29-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
