Subject:
|
Re: how to NAME patterned m/f faces for specific personas?...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Sun, 29 Oct 2000 08:47:58 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
571 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Franklin W. Cain writes:
> Howdy! I've got a minor problem,
> and I'd like to hear your thoughts on it. • [snip]
> But, with the Star Wars 'figs, we now have
> minifigs for _specifically_ _named_ _persons_
> (whether characters/roles/parts, or actors).
>
> So, my question is, how should we NAME these files?
> I see three choices:
>
> a. Generic descriptive
> b. Specificly named
> c. Some combination of "a." and "b."
Here is my suggestion:
In part description: Generic descriptive
In a "0 KEYWORDS " line: "Star Wars" followed by the Specific character name(s)
In plain "0 " comment lines: the long part japping about which was who in
what year.
For more information about "0 CATEGORY " and "0 KEYWORDS " lines, see
http://www.geocities.com/partsref/catkeyfaq.html
Greetings, M. Moolhuysen.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | how to NAME patterned m/f faces for specific personas?...
|
| Howdy! I've got a minor problem, and I'd like to hear your thoughts on it. As you may know, I recently encoded a few DAT files for some minifig head patterns, including some from the Star Wars theme. In the past, the NAME we'd give a DAT file for a (...) (24 years ago, 29-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
