 | | Re: Primitives to Hi-Res or not...
|
|
Lars C. Hassing skrev i meddelandet <948793526.13392@ns.cci.dk>... (...) What about a more general approach? Read a substitution table from an INI-file when L3P starts, then you don't have to compile new versions, we just have to add a line to the (...) (25 years ago, 25-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: February MOTM Voting online
|
|
Eric and Larry notes that the MOTM page looks a bit old. (...) To me it looked like Tim had forgotten to update the submission information, so I have done that. Play well, Jacob ---...--- -- E-mail: sparre@cats.nbi.dk -- -- Web...: <URL: (URL) > -- (...) (25 years ago, 25-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Missing parts of parts?
|
|
When I use certain decorated elements in LEdit, only the bottom, top, and decorated face appear; the others are simply absent. I've noticed this on the LL924 and LL928 bricks, as well as the Classic Space "down arrow" 1x2 brick and the very cool (...) (25 years ago, 25-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Making Ldraw Parts
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw "thomas burger" <tburger666@aol.com> (...) [snip] (...) In lugnet.cad.dev, Tim Courtney replied: (...) [snip] There is something I've written in the past that maybe is worthwhile to include in the parts tutorial: In the (...) (25 years ago, 25-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Primitives to Hi-Res or not...
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Imre Papp writes: [snip] (...) [snip] One note about those curved tracks: Because of part details, circular primitives can't be used efficiently for modelling curved tracks. I refer to the tapering at both ends and the saw- theeth (...) (25 years ago, 25-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: February MOTM Voting online
|
|
(...) I agree this looks like the January Page to me. Eric Kingsley The New England LEGO Users Group (URL) (25 years ago, 25-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: February MOTM Voting online
|
|
(...) caching, but it may be server caching somewhere between me or you. Why do I say that? because I got the january page. At least I think it is, it says voting is cut off Jan 24. But I voted anyway and it took it. So you may or may not want to (...) (25 years ago, 25-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | February MOTM Voting online
|
|
The voting for the February ldraw.org Model of the Month competition is now online! Please stop by and vote on your favorite model. (URL) timcourtne ICQ: 23951114 (25 years ago, 25-Jan-00, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Primitives to Hi-Res or not...
|
|
(...) There are two issues here. a) what resolution is appropriate to realistically render a part, b) how are the circular features of that a likely to connect/interact with other parts or feature of the same part. Issue b) is why we cannot (...) (25 years ago, 25-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Primitives to Hi-Res or not...
|
|
Paul Easter wrote about Hi-Res primitives: (...) L3P will correctly render any DAT file. But it will not substitute any Hi-Res primitives until I release the next version. I did program Hi-Res support in June 1999, so I guess it's about time for a (...) (25 years ago, 25-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Primitives to Hi-Res or not...
|
|
(...) My opinion is that we do need high res circular primitives (edge, disc, cyli, etc) in cases where the part includes curves/surfaces with a significantly larger diameter than 'usual'. The good old STUD.dat (and its familiy) looks OK with 16 (...) (25 years ago, 25-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Primitives to Hi-Res or not...
|
|
Ok, Can some one tell me where we are heading with these Hi-Res primitives. Today I created the Hi-Res versions of several of the "normal" primitives. Then I edited the main "normal" ones to use the Hi-Res instead. WOW! There was about a 10-20% (...) (25 years ago, 25-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Lost mail at partsref
|
|
(...) It should be 6 x 4. I'll update the file, so they match. (...) My bad. The number should be 43. Steve (25 years ago, 24-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: can someone please make me this part?
|
|
(...) Yeah, it is. Those transmissions are really neat too... -Tim (URL) timcourtne ICQ: 23951114 (25 years ago, 24-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: mirroring parts
|
|
Tore Eriksson <tore.eriksson@mbox3...wipnet.se> wrote in message news:388873F6.9A09BC...pnet.se... (...) look (...) been (...) doesn't (...) LDAO's Gridder works well for things like this, too. -John Van (25 years ago, 24-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Can anyone explain me why?
|
|
(...) ... (...) I tried a dummy part using 48\1-8disc.dat (the original) and it works fine on my system. Also, your most recent 2951.dat draws correctly on my system, both in LDLite and LDraw. I'm guessing there was a problem in the original (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Lost mail at partsref
|
|
(...) ...[snip]... (...) ...[snip]... (...) Steve, I believe that the description of the first file listed above should read "Flag 4 x 6" (and not "6 x 4"). If not, then the description of the subfile should be changed to read "6 x 4" to match the (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Lutz Uhlmann's New URL
|
|
Greetings Lutz just emailed me and asked me to post information regarding his new url at his own domain: (URL) also says, "Anyway, my page now has moved officially and is up to date with an new LGEO package (adding 69 new parts) and the latest parts (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jan-00, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Can anyone explain me why? [DAT]
|
|
As some of you may have noticed, I have had some problems making my 2951 behave. Out of frustration I made some changes to the hi-res 1-8disc.dat, and lo and behold, suddenly everything worked. Now, the weird thing is that there was nothing wrong (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts from 8448 not LDrawn
|
|
(...) Yup. I double-checked the two parts. Fredrick is correct, the new spring has fewer windings. And it is stiffer than the old spring. Other than the new spring, the pieces of the parts seem to be identical. Steve (25 years ago, 24-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
