To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / *2305 (-20)
  2 problems with the btrain motor 9v
 
1.it has a small blue area somewhere near the "lugs" on the front. 2.it should be called electric train motor 9v not electric train motor (both to fit in with the decroative side and also so that it can be distinguished from the 12v motor. both (...) (25 years ago, 25-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  do these parts exist in ldraw?
 
the tap for the homemaker sink part? the tile 1 x 2 with faucet from the homemaker and trains themes? the wierd round red ring type piece from the model team mach 2 red bird rig plane... see the instructions on kl.net to see which part i am talking (...) (25 years ago, 25-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: url for the parts tracker?
 
(...) Tim, Steve is speaking from a very wise standpoint (on many levels). You can never go wrong by offering to host things that people voluntarily contribute. But if people start to get the feeling that there is pressure to contribute or to let go (...) (25 years ago, 25-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  Re: OMR Model Creation/Submission Rules
 
(...) won't (...) in a (...) could be (...) I guess it could work if it is a widely-distributed mockup. If the part number is in the file correctly and in the correct position, no changes would have to be made to that line to get it to work properly (...) (25 years ago, 25-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  Re: OMR Model Creation/Submission Rules
 
(...) That's what I'd say too :) -Tim Courtney ldraw.org Project Coordinator (URL) timcourtne ICQ: 23951114 (25 years ago, 25-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  Re: url for the parts tracker?
 
(...) True. But it shouldn't be an immediate goal of ours. There's a couple things that hold importance here, the download area and the OMR. Once we get the ball rolling on these we can work on that. Anyways, Steve has a point. But something as (...) (25 years ago, 25-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: medium-sized ship hulls
 
which ones are these? are these the ones that are used for example on the new adventurers jungle boat? (25 years ago, 25-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: LDAO Suggestion Mark 2
 
(...) LDraw and LEdit do not support other directories. Well, they do, sort of. They will look for sub-files in the following locations: - ldraw\p - ldraw\parts - ldraw\models - current directory The last search option is what allows most programs (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: LDAO Suggestion Mark 2
 
(...) When LDAO starts moving (temporary) files in and out of ldraw\models, what should it do about the files already there? And what if the user launches model1\main.dat into LEdit, but then opens model2\main.dat into l3p? (...) In the File Save (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  medium-sized ship hulls
 
is there anyone out there that is working on the medium-sized ship hulls (fore and aft)? i have some truly terrible mock-ups i've made from bricks and plates but i thought i'd check with the professionals before proceeding with a project. thanks (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: LDAO Suggestion Mark 2
 
Steve Bliss wrote in message <37714eef.19012626@l...et.com>... (...) and (...) Ship1.dat (...) Unless you use name mangling... Why don't we just use real dirs, anyway. I'm sure ldlite, ldraw, and ledit support it. What programs do not. (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: a question about modeling the 9v battery box...
 
Jonathan Wilson <wilsonj@xoommail.com> wrote in message news:37723A43.C63B60...ail.com... (...) That would be the ideal, but it would probably get in without that stuff, since the battery box is basically never used such that the insides show. It (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: OMR Model Creation/Submission Rules
 
(...) suggestion. Notice (...) including commentary (...) makes it much (...) comment, it won't (...) correctly place it in a (...) to have to put (...) there could be (...) same as the (...) I think that if it is something like 0 insert piece 2916 (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  Re: can we please work out what to do about the black castle wall pieces?
 
(...) Unfortunately, we've been asking him to do this for the past couple months, and he has yet to listen. Along with proofreading, we've asked him to keep the message body text from the previous message. *Sigh* Jeff (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: OMR Model Creation/Submission Rules
 
I think you guys are missing the point of Tom's excellent suggestion. Notice the "0" in front of the 2916 line. That means he's just including commentary on where the part will go if and when it becomes official. It makes it much easier to add it in (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  a question about modeling the 9v battery box...
 
i have a friend who has a small collection of lego. that is where i origonally got the reference piece for the mast base and 1 x 2 x 1 black grill pannel from, amongst other pieces... this person has the 9v battery box (small). if i were to borrow (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: can we please work out what to do about the black castle wall pieces?
 
Chris Dee <chris_w_dee@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:FDu12p.3I1@lugnet.com... (...) meant (...) proof (...) Nice piece of deductive reasoning, Sherlok. -John Van (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: "Well-Formed" LDraw (Was: regular expressions for DAT file subpart lines)
 
(...) Both of the above are common output from LDAO code. (...) Well, I was just throwing stuff out. I don't know if LDraw would take that one, or not. (...) Darned context-sensitive constructions. (...) I didn't say they made sense. Just that they (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: OMR Model Creation/Submission Rules
 
(...) set, and if (...) the plain (...) file or in the (...) Submit it the set, (...) hatless? Also, what (...) standard smiley? (...) I'd say forget the hat, and smiling might help brighten up someone's day :) Ryan (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  Re: OMR Model Creation/Submission Rules
 
(...) So, what's the ruling on this? Omit the fig or submit it hatless? Also, what if a face design hasn't been created? Use a blank head or a standard smiley? Jeff (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR