 | | Re: Suggestion for part authors
|
|
(...) Good suggestion John. Something else for the QA process. I think I mentioned this before, but it would be real neat if there were a super-wireframe mode that rendered all optional lines. Any chance of this sometime in the future please, Paul ? (...) (25 years ago, 18-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Part Name Question
|
|
(...) Now that I think about it, it probably isn't necessary. I had a hard time positioning things on the end using John's mock-up, but I just realized it was probably because he was using one of the 'stud' primitives. So, Nevermind. ;) Jeff (25 years ago, 18-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Part Name Question
|
|
(...) Hadn't thought about that. Is it that important to view a stud instead of a line in LEdit? Seems like this piece has a 'normal geometry', so that it wouldn't make sense to defeat the line-as-stud option. (...) Yes. Steve (25 years ago, 18-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Suggestion for part authors
|
|
Just thought I'd mention that the wireframe view in LDLite is a great tool for part authors to check the edge lines and conditional lines in their parts before submission. Edge line omissions are usually much more obvious in this view, so take a (...) (25 years ago, 18-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Comments
|
|
(...) There's a Sort function, but it sorts by position, bottom-to-top, back-to-front. I put it there to help me transition models from the "adding pieces to the file when it's convenient" mode to the "present new pieces in order for other people to (...) (25 years ago, 18-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Page
|
|
(...) fixed. (...) i concur.. i never could nail down *what* was causing this to happen.. i just would bring up LDLite during the modeling process and suddenly my type 5's were turned into quads (type 4)... so i'd fix them all manually, grimace and (...) (25 years ago, 18-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Page
|
|
Steve Bliss <blisses@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:3741a938.209688...net.com... (...) some (...) fix (...) everyone.. (...) Inlining primitives with type 5 lines works fine. But at least sometimes inlining a subpart has turned the type 5 (...) (25 years ago, 18-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Comments
|
|
Is there already a button for this? It had odd results when I tried it long ago IIRC. -John Van Steve Bliss <blisses@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:3741a8a1.208175...net.com... (...) (25 years ago, 18-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Page
|
|
(...) Hmm. I don't remember hearing about this problem before. Probably did, and it fell out of my brain. I will look into the LDAO/inline code, and see what's up. Steve (25 years ago, 18-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Comments
|
|
(...) I've thought about writing a function in LDAO to sort a DAT file by line-type: first the 2 (edges) and 5 (conditionals), then the 1 (may be edges, surfaces, or both) then the 3 (triangles) and 4 (quads). Steve (25 years ago, 18-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
