 | | Re: Torso number was Forestman Torso was Voting Page
|
|
(...) So would be be alright to make the M:Tron torso be 974p068.dat, to maintain that consistency? Steve (25 years ago, 13-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Torso number was Forestman Torso was Voting Page
|
|
Chris Dee <chris_w_dee@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:FBoGA9.MAy@lugnet.com... (...) Except that some pXX numbers are consistent across a theme. All the M:Tron patterned parts are XXXXp68, for example. This makes them easier to remember. -John (...) (25 years ago, 13-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Torso number was Forestman Torso was Voting Page
|
|
(...) that (...) and (...) numbers (...) which (...) problem (...) a (...) If we must make this move, let's use up the gaps - I suggest 974 - as close to the arms as the hip piece is to the legs - but I guess it makes little difference. This would (...) (25 years ago, 13-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Suggestion for LDraw FAQ
|
|
[crossposted to lugnet.faq and lugnet.cad.dev, followup-to set to lugnet.faq] Looking at the LDraw FAQ, it looks like a new level of organization is needed, above the current levels. More precisely, a large number of the topics should be grouped (...) (25 years ago, 13-May-99, to lugnet.faq, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Torso number was Forestman Torso was Voting Page
|
|
(...) So waittaminut. I read you writing that 9326 *was* a number for the composite torso-with-arms-and-hands, but is not any longer used for that purpose. The 9xxx numbers were an earlier composite range. New parts are made with 5-digit numbers. So (...) (25 years ago, 13-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Working on Part 30384
|
|
(...) There is still a 'primitives committee' which discusses new primitives before they are released. We decided awhile ago to not introduce new primitive files, until/unless they were actually used in a file. Which is why the ldraw/p/ directory (...) (25 years ago, 13-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: 99-03 Voting: Quick Comments
|
|
(...) Coz they didn't? The nut is a unique part, as far as I can tell. It is round, and ribbed on the outside (ribs parallel to the axle), and I've never seen a part that could be machined down to make it. (well, not easily, you could probably (...) (25 years ago, 13-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Torso number was Forestman Torso was Voting Page
|
|
(...) Chris, you seem to by the "torso guy" around here, so if you have a good plan for those pieces, then go for it. And on another note, it has come to my attention that 9326 is NOT the torso number. I really hate to say this, but we need to move (...) (25 years ago, 13-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: 99-03 Voting: Quick Comments
|
|
(...) That is the same question I had about the construction. :-) And I liked Joshua's logic about the number. It groups them numerically very nicely, and saves using 3-digit #'s, so why not? (...) I would think so - without actually seeing the (...) (25 years ago, 13-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat
|
|
(...) Why not post it to dat.parts? -- Terry K -- (25 years ago, 13-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
