 | | ldglite Compilation concerns
|
|
I seem to have found a typo in ldglpr.c : ---Begin ldglpr.c line 51--- #ifdef OSMESA_OPTION #include "GL/osmesa.h" void *OSbuffer = NULL; OSMesaContext ctx; #endif ---End ldglpr.c line 55--- Shouldn't that be <GL/osmesa.h> I may be submitting some (...) (19 years ago, 5-Jan-06, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Wanted: Linux LDraw Expertise
|
|
I'd like to update the LDraw Linux install instructions found here: (URL) a general call to any Linux users out there that can help. -Orion (19 years ago, 5-Jan-06, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org's December Model and Scene of the Month Winners
|
|
(...) Thanks to everyone who voted for me and special thanks to all those who've written software, authored parts and otherwise contributed to the world of Lego CAD. Without all your hard work I'd have to use LDD for building CAD models ;) Tim (19 years ago, 3-Jan-06, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Call For Nominations: 2006 LDraw Steering Committee
|
|
Per the LDraw.org Bylaws, Subsection 6.03(a), the 2005 Steering Committee hereby calls for the community to nominate individuals as candidates for the 2006 Steering Committee[1]. Please post nominations in response to this message. Nominations will (...) (19 years ago, 3-Jan-06, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.announce) !
|
| |
| | LDraw.org's December Model and Scene of the Month Winners
|
|
Congratulations to the winners of the December Model/Scene of the month contests: (URL) MOTM, Lucy Stanford Angel by David V. Winkler> (URL) SOTM, Night time on the Moscow Metro by Tim Gould> The voting for the January Model of the Month and Scene (...) (19 years ago, 3-Jan-06, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.announce, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LSC - current status?
|
|
(...) No work is being done on this at the moment. I think I may be expected to submit an updated draft standard to the LSC on this topic. I will be quite busy in January and February (change of country+job), so it may take some time before I get (...) (19 years ago, 2-Jan-06, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Current Non-CA Author List
|
|
Here's a list of the authors who have not affirmed the CA. If you know one of these people, please have them contact us at LDraw.org. Chris Alano Christian M. Angele Emiel Visser Eric D'Aragon Fredrik Glöckner Howard Lande ISHINO Keiichiro James (...) (19 years ago, 29-Dec-05, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LSC - current status?
|
|
(...) Steve, Tore, Lars, Orion ... any? w. (19 years ago, 29-Dec-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: MOTM / SOTM Voting For December Is Now Open
|
|
(...) Here's the reply I got on the pnForums regarding the use of the authid: The main reasons are all security related. When a form is secured using authid: 1) The form can't be faked by inserting things into the get/post array. 2) The form is (...) (19 years ago, 7-Dec-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: MOTM / SOTM Voting For December Is Now Open
|
|
(...) I'm hesitant to use a captcha since it's just one more step in a process that's supposed to be quick and easy (i.e. it makes since to us webheads but the general user will see it as a pain-in-the-rear). I do however agree that a permissions (...) (19 years ago, 7-Dec-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: MOTM / SOTM Voting For December Is Now Open
|
|
(...) POVray worked hard for those images. Shrinking them is telling it that you have no respect for its work. You never know, all future renders might turn out wrong because it is mad. ;) Tim (19 years ago, 6-Dec-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: MOTM / SOTM Voting For December Is Now Open
|
|
(...) I could also email Orion a 800 x 600 version of mine.... (URL) (19 years ago, 6-Dec-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: MOTM / SOTM Voting For December Is Now Open
|
|
(...) While I agree with both of you, we should keep in mind that Orion said that this is a postnuke problem. Since the whole site is done with postnuke, I don't think there's much he can do about it, unless there's some postnuke option to work (...) (19 years ago, 6-Dec-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: MOTM / SOTM Voting For December Is Now Open
|
|
(...) Not to mention that it's trivial to bypass it if you did want to use a bot. If we need to do bot protection, we can use a captcha (similar to the way we're protecting the full installer) when votes are actually submitted. But there's no reason (...) (19 years ago, 6-Dec-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: MOTM / SOTM Voting For December Is Now Open
|
|
(...) Why do everyone want to force me to work sequentially?!? :-( (the SAS booking system has even worse tasking errors) I find it very hard to beleive that there is a real need to prevent me from having multiple windows open on the same site. As (...) (19 years ago, 6-Dec-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: MOTM / SOTM Voting For December Is Now Open
|
|
(...) A bug is currently preventing this. You can see all the winning entries but not the current submissions (i.e. what's on the ballot). I'm working to fix this. (...) Email me more detail and we might sort out which one is yours. -Orion (19 years ago, 6-Dec-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: MOTM / SOTM Voting For December Is Now Open
|
|
Hey Orion, Would it be possible for people without logins to at least be able to see the entries, even if they cannot vote? I had a login at one point, but tried all my normal usernames to no avail. Bruce (19 years ago, 5-Dec-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: MOTM / SOTM Voting For December Is Now Open
|
|
--SNIP-- (...) OK. Cheers. I did think it was a bit strict but my reading of the rules was that it was a requirement. I'll email you a new version of my image. Thanks for the clarification. Tim (19 years ago, 5-Dec-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: MOTM / SOTM Voting For December Is Now Open
|
|
(...) Yes that's exactly why. The way postnuke does user authintication involves generating an authorization key. Everytime you open a form it generates an auth key and when you click submit it passes the key along with the other form data. This (...) (19 years ago, 5-Dec-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: MOTM / SOTM Voting For December Is Now Open
|
|
(...) 800x600 isn't a hard limit on size, your entry can be larger. This doesn't mean you can submit a 8000x6000 image but 1024x768 is fine. The same applies for the 150k limit (however the rules wording on this point seems to imply differently so (...) (19 years ago, 5-Dec-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: MOTM / SOTM Voting For December Is Now Open
|
|
(...) Could it be because I opened two tabs - one with each of the categories - instead of working sequentially? When I tried again now, I was allowed to vote in the SOTM category. Play well, Jacob (19 years ago, 5-Dec-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: MOTM / SOTM Voting For December Is Now Open
|
|
(...) Strange. I managed to vote in both (or at least I saw no errors to indicate otherwise). Tim (19 years ago, 5-Dec-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: MOTM / SOTM Voting For December Is Now Open
|
|
(...) It looks like I was only allowed to vote in one of the two categories. First I voted in MOTM and got to a page saying "Thank you for voting". Second I voted in SOTM and got to a (similar) page saying "You are not authorized to carry out this (...) (19 years ago, 5-Dec-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: MOTM / SOTM Voting For December Is Now Open
|
|
(...) I'm not complaining as I think it's a bit of a silly rule but this entry (URL) does not fit the rules I read (800x600 and <150k). Does this mean the rules have been changed and if so, can I submit a larger entry of my scene? Yours, Tim (19 years ago, 5-Dec-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: MOTM / SOTM Voting For December Is Now Open
|
|
Oh wait: when I logon to LDraw.org first, I get no errors. Good work! (19 years ago, 5-Dec-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: MOTM / SOTM Voting For December Is Now Open
|
|
(...) when i click the link I get: Fatal error: Call to a member function on a non-object in /usr/www/users/peero...pnuser.php on line 313 Good thing this is restarted again! Thumbs up! :) (19 years ago, 5-Dec-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | MOTM / SOTM Voting For December Is Now Open
|
|
We're pleased to announce that voting for the December 2005 Model of the Month and Scene of the Month Contests is now open. Visit the voting page to cast your vote: (URL) inform me of any errors you may encounter. -Orion (19 years ago, 5-Dec-05, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.announce)
|
| |
| | Re: Art of Illusion
|
|
(...) Any news in this matter? I have been using AOI for a few years now and it's now a very nice and competent software, latest version 2.2 is impressive. :) A good and growing AOI forum: (URL) (19 years ago, 30-Nov-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org MOTM/SOTM Relaunch
|
|
(...) Thanks that's fixed now. I had to enter all the winners in to the database by hand so I expect a few mistakes that lead to broken images. -Orion (19 years ago, 30-Nov-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org MOTM/SOTM Relaunch
|
|
(...) Yep, looks good. I did notice that the January 2000 MOTM entry has a broken link for its actual image while browsing, but all the others I looked at worked fine. --Travis (19 years ago, 29-Nov-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org MOTM/SOTM Relaunch
|
|
(...) Yeah, I think so as well. I had a problems with this on other similar pages. (...) Yes, it was first implemented for the March 2004 contest. (...) The different views are for the contest ballot only. Once an entry wins, I chase one view and (...) (19 years ago, 29-Nov-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org MOTM/SOTM Relaunch
|
|
I get the same error when I try to click on the voting page: (URL) It might dissapear when some entries are added... Btw, the guidelines of MOTM say that we should send in ldr, mpd or dats, and you will render them from three different angles.. Is (...) (19 years ago, 29-Nov-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org MOTM/SOTM Relaunch
|
|
(...) You found a bug in my code (not unexpected at all considering the size of the module). I've applied a workaround and everything should be visible now. -Orion (19 years ago, 28-Nov-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org MOTM/SOTM Relaunch
|
|
(...) site decorations) with this in it when I click on the most recent winners, and two columns of this when I search past winners. I'm logged into my ldraw.org account when this happens. --Travis (19 years ago, 28-Nov-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | LDraw.org MOTM/SOTM Relaunch
|
|
I'm pleased to announce the relaunch of LDraw.org's MOTM/SOTM contest. After writing a few thousand lines of code, the core functionality for the new contest and voting module finished. There's not a whole lot different visually but the archive (...) (19 years ago, 28-Nov-05, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.announce) !
|
| |
| | Re: Ldraw to Bricklink shopping list converter
|
|
(...) Very cool. I like to see MPD support, if possible. -Orion (19 years ago, 26-Nov-05, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
|
| |
| | Ldraw to Bricklink shopping list converter
|
|
Hi, want to quickly search Bricklink for parts in your Ldraw creation? check (URL): just upload your Ldraw file, and you'll get a complete list of links to Bricklink search pages. Let me know how you like this tool, and make sure you try the MLCad (...) (19 years ago, 26-Nov-05, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
|
| |
| | LDraw.org MOTM Status
|
|
It's been a while since the MOTM contest has been run and I feel that I owe an explanation to those who support me and LDraw.org. As some of you may know, I'm enlisted in the US Navy. Due to a combination of work schedule change, the planning and (...) (19 years ago, 23-Nov-05, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: L3P-Bug using LGEO
|
|
--SNIP-- (...) IMO the best solution would be to have a magic number at the start of the parts. eg. 0 LDP or something. That way the 'partness' of each part would be quicly verified merely be reading the first five bytes of the file regardless of (...) (19 years ago, 16-Nov-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: L3P-Bug using LGEO
|
|
(...) Surely the extension is entirely to identify the type of file, otherwise they would be irrelevant? While I understand that .dat is a widely used extension it would be foolish if any change was to .ldr (for parts), another extension would make (...) (19 years ago, 16-Nov-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
