 | | Re: Is there a Part creating Tutorial?
|
|
(...) Nope. That is the bad boy, AFAIK. Actually, the people to ask about patterns are the ones that do good ones. One name that immediately springs to mind is Chris Dee. And there are many others. It is important to note the a good pattern has many (...) (26 years ago, 14-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: part: brick 1 x 2 with arm 2F
|
|
(...) No. I will not ignore them. But I don't look forward to slogging through a bunch of parts finding obvious, glaring errors. Ones that should _NOT_ be there in pieces submitted for voting. And I can only assume that the errors are there because: (...) (26 years ago, 14-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: L3P support of extended metacommands?
|
|
(...) Follow-up. What -c switch? It tells me that option is unknown. -- Terry K -- (26 years ago, 14-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: L3P support of extended metacommands?
|
|
(...) Trying to pique my interest? You have done so. Now I _have_ to get it to see what -c does. Pretty sneaky. :-) -- Terry K -- (26 years ago, 14-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet.cad.dat heirarchy
|
|
(...) Primitives are a special case. Right now, consideration and approval of any new primitive file is done by consensus of a small group of part authors. Anyone may suggest a primitive to that group. And new members can be added to that group, (...) (26 years ago, 14-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
