|
|
 | | Re: narts posted to cad.dat`
|
| (...) All I can say is, before you send _any_ parts (or narts), you should look at each and every one with a HYPERCRITICAL eye. If you note any flaws, don't send it. If people here on lugnet have noted flaws fix them, or don't send. Do NOT assume a (...) (26 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: part: brick 1 x 2 w/ pattern, technic pin long w/ bush
|
| (...) Jonathan, whether you understand what the complaints are about or not, just take it on faith that this part is _wrong_. As someone else said, if you would get this piece and actually look at it, you would clearly see the flaws. Right now, (...) (26 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: Ldraw.org: Organization and look & feel
|
| (...) That is sort of the de-facto "standard". Jorge Gonzalez (1) used this method for the sets he did, as have others. -- Terry K -- 1. Pretty sure it was JG. JG, sorry if I misspelled your name. (26 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: fixed part: JW's parts
|
| (...) sorry roy, but i have to disagree with you here... take a look at the 1x2 tile (3068)... simple, elegant, and as far as i'm concerned (especially after i went back and personally put in the bottom groove) it is *perfect*.. true, there isn't (...) (26 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: fixed part: JW's parts
|
| (...) this line concerns me very *very* much. (...) as a matter of fact.. yes.... while you *should* be able to enjoy modeling things using the existing library of LDraw elements, if i had known all along that you are 100% sans lego i would have (...) (26 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
