 | | Re: New BFC Spec
|
|
(...) OK, I wasn't aware it was in there. However, according to the huge meta-command thread, people have created meta-commands with mixed case and some that aren't case-sensitive. Nobody mentioned there that this was illegal according to the LDraw (...) (22 years ago, 29-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: New BFC Spec
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Steve Bliss writes: <snip> (...) This is already in the LDRAW file spec. All meta statements are required to be in all caps. -Orion (22 years ago, 29-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: New BFC Spec
|
|
(...) I have to disagree with this (nice of you to say it, though :). Ultimately, the community has the final say. Here's my feedback & suggested revisions for version 12. You could've just dropped the old revision numbers. That would have made the (...) (22 years ago, 29-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Problem with PT File Queue?
|
|
(...) Yes and no. I couldn't see any problem with the page (unless there's some subtle linux thing involved with one process reading a file, and another process overwriting the file in the middle of the first process' read loop). For now, I've (...) (22 years ago, 29-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LPub and Lsynth page for tracking enhancement requests and bug fixes
|
|
(...) Paul, Because L3P doesn't know anything about buffer exchange or rotation steps, LPub creates a DAT for each step and handles all the rotation and stuff. Is there mechanism in LDLite that will let LPub interact with LDLite through interprocess (...) (22 years ago, 29-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LPub and Lsynth page for tracking enhancement requests and bug fixes
|
|
(...) :-) (...) day about adding support for Buffer Exchange and Rotation Steps, etc. Maybe if LPub supported it, LDLite wouldn't have to make those changes. -Tim (22 years ago, 28-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | LPub and Lsynth page for tracking enhancement requests and bug fixes
|
|
Hi All, I've been doing some building lately to recharge my tactile batteries, but LPub and Lsynth have been starting to stur up back-of-the-brain activity. I've gotten so many suggestions (especially from Tim Courtney who emails me almost every day (...) (22 years ago, 28-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Problem with PT File Queue?
|
|
(...) Any good news on this yet? It's hard to tell what to review if you can't tell what needs it most. Thanks! (22 years ago, 28-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | New E-mail address
|
|
Dear fellow LEGO fans, I am sending this message to the groups I regularly read and post to, because since today my E-mail address that I used to post with no longer exists! It was jmolen@globalxs.nl... :-( My new adres will be jmolen@zonnet.nl and (...) (22 years ago, 28-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dat.models, lugnet.cad.dat.models.sets, lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.mlcad, lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.inst, lugnet.loc.nl, lugnet.space, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: New Poll on LDraw.org
|
|
(...) Ok, the program cycled. It appears to be counting the votes for the 6th option, but the graphic still presents an error. I checked the references to the includes and they all line up. I wonder if Jacob and I didn't prepare a sixth set of (...) (22 years ago, 26-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: New Poll on LDraw.org
|
|
(...) Tim, I just voted for '//' and not only is the error message still there for the newest option, but the '//' option still shows 0 votes also. -Kyle (22 years ago, 26-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: New Poll on LDraw.org
|
|
(...) Results update once an hour. It says that in italics under the "Results" header. :-) -Tim (22 years ago, 26-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: New Poll on LDraw.org
|
|
(...) Kevin (22 years ago, 26-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: New Poll on LDraw.org
|
|
(...) the results. When I first created the poll yesterday, all entries were like that until the cylce came around. Then it reflected results accurately. I re-created the poll today with 6 possible answers. I believe that reset the data from before (...) (22 years ago, 26-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: New Poll on LDraw.org
|
|
(...) still a little broken: (URL) (22 years ago, 26-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: New Poll on LDraw.org
|
|
(...) Fixed. -Tim (22 years ago, 26-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: New Poll on LDraw.org
|
|
(...) Ok, I'll update it soon. I figured since I heard nothing, I'd just post it. :-) -Tim (22 years ago, 26-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: New Poll on LDraw.org
|
|
(...) saying "I do know what you're talking about, but I want a different option". (22 years ago, 26-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | New Poll on LDraw.org
|
|
Finally! It was a combination laziness and uh, laziness that kept the previous poll online so long. After hacking a few pages, I present you with a new poll. (URL) (22 years ago, 26-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Camera Positioning
|
|
(...) This document describes a method of scaling to fit a bounding sphere into a viewport, starting somewhere around page 30. (URL) would think you'd have to pick a camera angle first, or fix one of the other variables like the distance to the (...) (22 years ago, 25-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.ray)
|
