| |
> These truncated filenames never went past the LSC, and as such should probably
> be held. I personally feel that they are inappropriate, but whether or not I
> think they are appropriate, I believe that it's the LSC's job to determine
> that.
Well... imho this should not be an issue at all - if the parts tracker was
updated!
Philo
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: 11-16 primitives?
|
| (...) These truncated filenames never went past the LSC, and as such should probably be held. I personally feel that they are inappropriate, but whether or not I think they are appropriate, I believe that it's the LSC's job to determine that. (...) (15 years ago, 25-Sep-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
22 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
