 | | Re: Updated Primitive - 1-8t0102 1/8 torus, 1-inner Radius, 2-outer radius —Steve Bliss
|
| | | Paul (et al), Sorry I haven't replied to this message, I've been meaning to, but I didn't want to rush out a quick reply without thinking things through. I'm not sure I've thought things through thoroughly, but I thought I'd at least throw this out. (...) (24 years ago, 4-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Torus primitive discussion. was( Updated Primitive - 1-8t0102 1/8 torus) —Paul Easter
|
| | | | (...) Hello, Torus comments are welcome from anyone who it may affect. I'm sure there are others out there that will use these when they become familiar with them. (...) Ok, give it a throw... :-) (...) Yes, I am afraid so. (...) I can agree to (...) (24 years ago, 8-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Torus primitive discussion. was( Updated Primitive - 1-8t0102 1/8 torus) —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) Because I was thinking that each section covered 90-degrees of the major circle. Otherwise, they'd be named 16t*0301.dat, since each is 1/16 of a complete torus. (I suppose they could be described as 1/8 of an inner (or outer) torus, but I (...) (24 years ago, 8-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Torus primitive discussion. was( Updated Primitive - 1-8t0102 1/8 torus) —Paul Easter
|
| | | | Sorry about taking so long to reply to this message. I have been working on trying to make a few of these torii mentioned below. (...) That is what I meant. :-) (...) If we worked with the method used for the rings and similar existing primitives, I (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Torus primitive discussion. was( Updated Primitive - 1-8t0102 1/8 torus) —Paul Easter
|
| | | | Does anyone have anything to say or add about the torus primitives? I have a few parts in process that use parts of a torus that can be finished up once we decide on a format and file name structure. Any comments are welcome. Some of the parts can (...) (24 years ago, 9-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Torus primitive discussion. was( Updated Primitive - 1-8t0102 1/8 torus) —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | Other than questioning the practice of putting POV-Ray code in files for the parts library, I've got no problems with the torus files. Steve (...) (24 years ago, 11-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Torus primitive discussion. was( Updated Primitive - 1-8t0102 1/8 torus) —Paul Easter
|
| | | | (...) I put the POV codes in since I wasn't sure how long it would be before they would be adopted into the parts library. Do you think that this can be easily implimented into L3P? Lars? I have put a few small pictures on my Utilities pages with (...) (24 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Torus primitive discussion. was( Updated Primitive - 1-8t0102 1/8 torus) —Lars C. Hassing
|
| | | | Paul Easter wrote... (...) Sure, I'm just awaiting the final filename convention, so that I can make a programmatic (versus hardcoded) substitution covering all future primitives released. Something like "NtiFFFF.dat" for "1/N Torus Tube Inner Major (...) (24 years ago, 15-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Torus primitive discussion. was( Updated Primitive - 1-8t0102 1/8 torus) —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) How about using: TNNXFFFF.dat Where T is T, NN is the fraction of the major circle, X is I/O for inner or outer, and FFFF is the fractional ratio of tube radius to major radius. I'm suggesting this specific format for the following reasons: 1. (...) (24 years ago, 16-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Torus primitive discussion. was( Updated Primitive - 1-8t0102 1/8 torus) —Paul Easter
|
| | | | Ok, Let me see if I can make some sense of this... I have read it sevaral times. (...) OK, great! (...) Sorry, can't seem to follow this statement. (...) OK. (...) I agree, but not sure about the 3.6 degree version, that's a bit extreme. (...) ah... (...) (24 years ago, 23-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Torus primitive discussion. was( Updated Primitive - 1-8t0102 1/8 torus) —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) OK, let me try to explain. Lars had suggested: (...) Which uses 7 characters in the filename, out of the 8 allowed. I just dedicated the 8th character to N, so we had NN instead. This gives us a fixed-format for the filename, no matter what (...) (24 years ago, 23-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Torus primitive discussion. —Paul Easter
|
| | | | (...) OK, Got it! Sounds good to me. So we are going to use; tNNxFFFF.dat t=Torus NN=sweep of torus, 01=1/1, 02=1/2, 04=1/4, 08=1/8, 16=1/16, 48=1/48? x=i:Inner or o:Outer FFFF=Tube Radius Ex. 1/3=3333 I have already changed my spreadsheets and (...) (24 years ago, 24-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Torus primitive discussion. —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) Absolutely not. (...) Send them to parts@ldraw.org. (...) Leave it in for now. Steve (24 years ago, 26-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Torus primitive discussion. —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) Oops! I meant "Absolutely not" as in "I have no more suggestions", not "Don't do it, no way." Sorry if it didn't come across the way I meant it. I think this pot has definitely boiled long enough. Steve (24 years ago, 27-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| | | | |
