|
|
 | | Re: N-Fedge primitives
|
| (...) The consistency is in the basic four fractions: 1-4, 2-4, 3-4, 4-4. The other measures are (more or less) deliberate inconsistencies to name files that don't fit the basic standard. (...) Yes, that would be an incorrect consideration. Part (...) (21 years ago, 9-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives, FTX)
| | | | | Re: N-Fedge primitives
|
| (...) It's not really that hard, but my mind recoils at a senseless inconsistency, and this, and the following, are it. Note that I suggested an alias, not move, and certainly not removing the existing names. (...) "0 Circle 1.0". 5-8edge should be (...) (21 years ago, 9-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives, FTX)
| | | | | Re: N-Fedge primitives
|
| (...) Great - we are always looking for constructive help. (...) I don't see the benefit from this - the naming convention is well established and existing part authors know how to work with it. Is it that hard to learn? (...) Yes - as I have (...) (21 years ago, 8-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
| | | | | N-Fedge primitives
|
| Hello, everyone. This was posted with NNTP, but seems to have dissappeared somehow, so I'm re-posting with the http interface. My appolgies if it turns up twice. I'm just getting started with LDraw, and returning to the lego-driven days of my youth, (...) (21 years ago, 8-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
| | | | | Re: cylinders missing conditional lines?
|
| (...) I don't get that last thing with tangent lines (probably because english is not my native language). At the moment the official library contains 25 partial cylinder and cone primitives, out of which 21 have conditional lines at both ends and 4 (...) (21 years ago, 4-Nov-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
|
