 | | Re: Primitive Needed: t04o2000.dat
|
|
(...) Thanks, Chris. That was fast! /Tore (22 years ago, 14-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: Primitive Needed: t04o2000.dat
|
|
(...) Now on the Parts Tracker at (URL) to Paul Easter's excellent generator. Paul - please let me know how you'd like such files credited - 99% of the work was yours. Chris (22 years ago, 14-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Primitive Needed: t04o2000.dat
|
|
Anybody? TIA, /Tore (22 years ago, 14-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | POV-friendlier(?) Connect.dat (Technic Pin with Base Collar) [DAT]
|
|
Here's my attempt to make a Techic Pin that should look better in POV-Ray. I'm afraid it will not work with POV-Ray versions lower than 3.1 PTMWYT /Tore 0 Technic Pin with Base Collar 0 Name: connect.dat 0 Author: James Jessiman 0 Original LDraw (...) (22 years ago, 10-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: "Clusters" of Studs?
|
|
(...) A 3x3, 3x4 and 4x4 trilogy : * is only 3 files which satisfies the demanded compactness * is 9 to 16 times faster than individual studs which satisfies the demanded speed & size gain * covers any rectangle >= 6x6 which satisfies the demanded (...) (22 years ago, 27-Oct-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: "Clusters" of Studs?
|
|
(...) Maybe it's better to call the Groups instead of Clusters. The file names would be less confusing that way. /Tore (22 years ago, 21-Oct-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: "Clusters" of Studs?
|
|
(...) Hey, thanks for thinking of me! At present, I believe the only "official unofficial" stud primitives for the clone.dat project are studc.dat and stud2cl.dat. I'll have to double-check the studc2z.dat, though. In the interest of diplomacy and (...) (22 years ago, 21-Oct-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: "Clusters" of Studs?
|
|
(...) I thought of 4x4, too. First I rejected the idea as I thought it would only save 15 lines in a file but then I realized that it can be used more than once in a file. I can't find any other sombinations that I would like to have. Maybe, maybe a (...) (22 years ago, 20-Oct-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: "Clusters" of Studs?
|
|
(...) In principle this sounds OK to me, but I would want to be somewhat restrictive about how many new files we have - 4x4, 6x6, 8x8 sound good combinations. What others? Regarding a naming convention, though, do we know how all renderers recognise (...) (22 years ago, 20-Oct-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | "Clusters" of Studs?
|
|
Inspired by parts\s\4186a.dat, I would like to see "clusters" of studs, say 6 x 6 and 8 x 8. That would make a lot of part files *much* smaller. Maybe we could call them Stud36.dat and Stud64.dat? /Tore (22 years ago, 18-Oct-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
