 | | Re: "Clusters" of Studs?
|
|
(...) Maybe it's better to call the Groups instead of Clusters. The file names would be less confusing that way. /Tore (22 years ago, 21-Oct-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: "Clusters" of Studs?
|
|
(...) Hey, thanks for thinking of me! At present, I believe the only "official unofficial" stud primitives for the clone.dat project are studc.dat and stud2cl.dat. I'll have to double-check the studc2z.dat, though. In the interest of diplomacy and (...) (22 years ago, 21-Oct-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: "Clusters" of Studs?
|
|
(...) I thought of 4x4, too. First I rejected the idea as I thought it would only save 15 lines in a file but then I realized that it can be used more than once in a file. I can't find any other sombinations that I would like to have. Maybe, maybe a (...) (22 years ago, 20-Oct-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: "Clusters" of Studs?
|
|
(...) In principle this sounds OK to me, but I would want to be somewhat restrictive about how many new files we have - 4x4, 6x6, 8x8 sound good combinations. What others? Regarding a naming convention, though, do we know how all renderers recognise (...) (22 years ago, 20-Oct-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | "Clusters" of Studs?
|
|
Inspired by parts\s\4186a.dat, I would like to see "clusters" of studs, say 6 x 6 and 8 x 8. That would make a lot of part files *much* smaller. Maybe we could call them Stud36.dat and Stud64.dat? /Tore (22 years ago, 18-Oct-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: Toruseses?
|
|
(...) A new, fully revised and up-to-date Primitives Reference is currently undergoing review. I hope to be able to make this public on ldraw.org soon. This will answer both there questions (and more !). Chris (22 years ago, 10-Oct-02, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: Toruseses?
|
|
(...) ... and a guide on how to interpret all the numbers in the file names/descriptions? For example: 0 Torus Outside 1 x 0.0625 x 0.25 0 Name: t04o0625.dat I have no idea of what the numbers stand for... /Tore (22 years ago, 10-Oct-02, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | 1-16sphe.dat? [DAT]
|
|
Hi all, I have a question about the sphere primitives: Does there exists a 1-16sphe.dat? (the half of a 1-8sphe) If not, is it possible that I could make one like this (only wireframe): 1 16 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 10 1-4edge.dat 1 16 0 0 0 9.2388 (...) (22 years ago, 1-Oct-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | 4-4disc.dat [DAT]
|
|
Also here is an optimised 4-4disc which uses seven quads to replace 16 triangles which results in 14 triangles if split up. I know that optimizing discs by replacing triangles with quads has not been very popular as many renderers splut quads up (...) (22 years ago, 27-Aug-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | 2-4 disc primitive [DAT]
|
|
Here is an optimised version of the 2-4 disc primitive. Instead of 8 traingles it uses 1 triangle and 3 quads or 7 triangles when the quads are split. 0 Disc .5 0 Name: 2-4disc.dat 0 Author: James Jessiman 0 Original LDraw Primitive 0 LDRAW_ORG (...) (22 years ago, 27-Aug-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
