Subject:
|
Re: New Part: 41530 Propellor 8 Blade 5 Diameter
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dat.parts
|
Date:
|
Fri, 2 Dec 2005 04:01:28 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3344 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Steve Bliss wrote:
> In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Amnon Silverstein wrote:
> > I was worried that sub-parts will have a slight error between
> > the edge alignments, and this would put some thin cracks in the full assembly.
> > Is this an issue?
>
> No, it's not an issue. Within a reasonable amount of error, of course. If
> subfiles are positioned orthoganally to each other, there should be no alignment
> errors. With this part, that's not possible. You can reduce the size of the
> calculation errors by using more decimal places in the rotation matrix of the
> subfile command. Typically, 3 decimal places is recommended in part files, but
> for odd-angle rotations, more than 3 places can be a good thing.
I don't expect it to be a problem, but if you do see seams, you can always have
the subfile contain two blades, in which case the alignment between the files
becomes exact.
--Travis
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: New Part: 41530 Propellor 8 Blade 5 Diameter
|
| (...) No, it's not an issue. Within a reasonable amount of error, of course. If subfiles are positioned orthoganally to each other, there should be no alignment errors. With this part, that's not possible. You can reduce the size of the calculation (...) (19 years ago, 2-Dec-05, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
