Subject:
|
Re: New Part: 41530 Propellor 8 Blade 5 Diameter
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dat.parts
|
Date:
|
Wed, 30 Nov 2005 18:14:05 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2765 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Steve Bliss wrote:
> In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Travis Cobbs wrote:
> > Text, as the file is still scrambled. As for the part itself, you definitely
> > want to create sub-part for a single blade, and then reference that sub-part
> > 8 times in the main part. That will make the file a great deal smaller.
>
> Or, make the sub-part be half of a blade, and reference it 16 times.
I thought about suggesting that, but unless you skip the polygons around the
outside of the blade, (and put them into a higher-level "full blade" sub-part),
this will add new polygons, since the polygons around the outside of the blade
span both sides of the proposed cut line. I personally don't believe that the
file-size savings are worth adding a bunch of extra polygons, but other people
might disagree. Pulling the spanning polygons out into a higher sub-file would
produce the smallest possible file with the same number of polygons, but it
would take more work.
--Travis
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: New Part: 41530 Propellor 8 Blade 5 Diameter
|
| (...) Or, make the sub-part be half of a blade, and reference it 16 times. (...) The axle-hole area could probably be replaced with one or more primitives. I'd have to compare this part to the existing axlehole primitives to be sure. (...) I totally (...) (19 years ago, 30-Nov-05, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
