|
|
 | | Re: WOULD YOU PLEASE...
|
| (...) I can understand you. But I think primitives with are used by a lot of parts should be available to change by anyone. In the other hand a _part_ (or subpart) should never changed if it's on the PT. CU Bernd (23 years ago, 7-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
| | | | | Re: WOULD YOU PLEASE...
|
| [crossposted to lugnet.cad.dev, with followup-to set there as well -- this thread isn't about posting LDR files to lugnet] (...) If anyone is not sure about the general rule/protocol/guidelines on this: for new parts (not fixes), you should *always* (...) (23 years ago, 6-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: New Primitive Class
|
| (...) If we can only create outside sections,[1] why not keep the leading t, but change the i/o/q? Maybe x, for extended? As for the ratio decimals in the file name, instead of noting the tube:major ratio (which is >1), use the inverse major:tube (...) (23 years ago, 6-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
| | | | | Re: WOULD YOU PLEASE...
|
| (...) Woah, hold it there cowboy. The ONLY fix I will apply to a part not already submitted as a fix would be to slightly adjust the part position. I feel that small and minor errors can be fixed by anyone and would only fly off the handle (ok, I (...) (23 years ago, 6-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
| | | | | WOULD YOU PLEASE...
|
| ...yes, would you please ask PERMISSION before you mess up my code! Yes I'm angry, but I'm so sick! currently there is spreading a rude behaviour at the PT, especially by the reviewers. grabbing a part and fix an error before an author can get a (...) (23 years ago, 6-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
