 | | Re: Classic Windows: How many versions? Please respond!
|
|
(...) Are the long ledge versions older than the short ledge versions? Why not have the oldest version 'a' and the newer version 'b', etc. The window frame and the glass are actually two seperate parts, glued together. When making the glassed (...) (22 years ago, 9-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Classic Windows: How many versions? Please respond!
|
|
(...) Yes. (...) You're right. I thought that the 'a' version was the version most likely to be used, but now, looking at tiles and 1x1 round bricks, I noticed that my theory fell. (...) Oh no, so the 7930 door also exists in a without-glass (...) (22 years ago, 9-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Classic Windows: How many versions? Please respond!
|
|
Niels: (...) Tore: (...) I don't know about a real glassless version of the 7930 door, but I noticed when rendering the 368 taxi house that the 7930 door did not have glass. The current official LDraw part 7930.dat has no glass! Since I have only (...) (22 years ago, 9-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Classic Windows: How many versions? Please respond!
|
|
(...) That's looking from the manufacturer's point of wiev. I prefer to look at LDrawing from the builder's. When there are TLG part numbers available, of course they should be used. But I see no point wasting 3-digit numbers in vain. (...) Maybe I (...) (22 years ago, 9-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
