 | | Re: x342: ~Technic Flex-System End —Fredrik Glöckner
|
| | | Very interesting parts! I have a couple of comments, though. Perhaps the name "Technic Flex-System Wire" would be more appropriate? We already have "Technic Flex-System Hose" elements (76.DAT and 77.DAT), so I think that adding "Wire" makes sense. I (...) (22 years ago, 27-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: x342: ~Technic Flex-System End —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | (...) 8?) (...) Good idea! But thinking about it, the "aussie" word that works best is probably "cable", so maybe I'll use that. (...) Can do! Only reason its different is because Miguel's connector(s) are oriented that way & I was too lazy to (...) (22 years ago, 27-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: x342: ~Technic Flex-System End —Fredrik Glöckner
|
| | | | (...) I agree! "Cable" is much better. I knew that "Wire" was sub-optimal when I wrote the article, but I couldn't come up with a better word at the time. (...) Fredrik (22 years ago, 28-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: x342: ~Technic Flex-System End —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | (...) OK. Updated BFC certified versions now available at (URL) (22 years ago, 28-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: x342: ~Technic Flex-System End —Fredrik Glöckner
|
| | | | (...) No documentation has been added yet, but it works the usual way. Here's an example. Try these two end parts: 0 1 8 50 0 0 0 0 -1 1 0 0 0 -1 0 x342.DAT 1 8 0 0 50 0 -1 0 -1 0 0 0 0 -1 x342.DAT 0 Put the cursor on either of the part lines, and (...) (22 years ago, 31-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | | |
