Subject:
|
Re: possible error in the usage of part 80.dat
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dat.parts
|
Date:
|
Mon, 18 Dec 2000 19:22:31 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
839 times
|
| |
| |
"koen" <koen.jordens@student.kuleuven.ac.be> writes:
> looking at 80.dat it looks like you have a length of 1.8 for the
> cilinder (which is probably more accurate), yet when placing 2 80's
> next to eachother (like in 78.dat) this becomes 3.6, So I thought the
> correct way of usage would be to have the end cilinders of 2 parts
> overlap completely.
I don't know what the "correct" way to use the 80.DAT is. In 78.DAT
they are put so that they overlap by 0.4LDU. Yes, they do overlap in
78.DAT. This makes the distance between the "thick parts" 3.6 - 0.4 =
3.2.
The width of the notches is 3.0LDU. I didn't actually measure the
distance between the notches. Instead I took a long hose, measured the
length between the centre of the end notches and counted the number of
"holes" between them. This would probably yield a more egg-zact result.
Fredrik
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: | | Re: possible error in the usage of part 80.dat [DAT]
|
| (...) hmmm, it appears to be you are correct. with measuring a long piece I come to 3 LDU for the small part if I use 3 LDU for the notch. It just seemed strange to me that I couldn't intertwine the notches of 2 hoses yet the dat files show that (...) (24 years ago, 19-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: possible error in the usage of part 80.dat [DAT]
|
| (...) from my measurements the thick part is 3LDU and the small part is 2 LDU. looking at 80.dat it looks like you have a length of 1.8 for the cilinder (which is probably more accurate), yet when placing 2 80's next to eachother (like in 78.dat) (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|