 | | Re: [part] Updated S\973S01.DAT
|
|
(...) Ya know, it seems awfully crass for me to put my name in there, seeing that Steve has done the vast, vast bulk of the work and I basically just fixed a typo. I'd be inclined just to strike my name from that list -- what do y'all think? Cheers, (...) (24 years ago, 17-Aug-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: [part] Updated S\973S01.DAT [DAT]
|
|
(...) Since you included the update-comment: (...) I'd be inclined to not change the author line. Earlier version: (...) Jeremy's change: (...) If you're going to remove the neck-mark, you might just as well do: 1 16 0 -4 0 6 0 0 0 -8 0 0 0 6 (...) (24 years ago, 17-Aug-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: [part] Updated S\973S01.DAT
|
|
(...) For the sake of keeping the basic part free of marks, how about putting the neck mark in a bitmap subfile, like how the torso patterns are done? Cheers, - jsproat (24 years ago, 17-Aug-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: [part] Updated S\973S01.DAT
|
|
(...) Have you ever seen a torso with the neck-mark? ;) I'll think about it... Steve (24 years ago, 17-Aug-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: [part] Updated S\973S01.DAT
|
|
(...) Erk. That's *without* the neck-mark. Argh. Steve (24 years ago, 18-Aug-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: [part] Updated S\973S01.DAT
|
|
(...) :-, Yah, on some extremely well-used torso pieces. ;-) I was just thinking along the lines that, very few "core" LDraw parts have patterns -- the typical action is to make an unmarked part first, then refer to that unmarked part in a different (...) (24 years ago, 18-Aug-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: [part] Updated S\973S01.DAT
|
|
(...) Good points. So the neck-marked torso would be the first among many patterned torso parts. Sort of like the plain minifig head vs. the smiley-face minifig head. (checking Partsref) Drat! 973p01 is already taken! That would have been the (...) (24 years ago, 21-Aug-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: [part] Updated S\973S01.DAT
|
|
(...) How about 973p00 ? (...) But it'd really be a one-line change, with an easily recognizable failure condition (i.e. the neck mark doesn't show up), so not many worries there. Cheers, - jsproat (24 years ago, 21-Aug-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: [part] Updated S\973S01.DAT
|
|
(...) Hmm. A bit unorthodox, but it would work... (...) Yah. Just tedious. I'd rather change 37 lines in one file, than one line in 37 files. Steve (24 years ago, 22-Aug-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: [part] Updated S\973S01.DAT
|
|
(...) My personal (perfectionist) preference would be to remove the mark from 973s01.dat and add it in the correct colour to each decorated torso. Since I have authored the majority of the torsos, I feel a responsibility to do this (wishing I'd (...) (24 years ago, 25-Aug-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: [part] Updated S\973S01.DAT
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Chris Dee wrote: [about changing the neck-mark on minifig torso part files] (...) Right. Since 973.dat would be the only file without a neckmark, it makes sense to keep the 3/4 neck in s\973s01.dat, and have each torso file (...) (24 years ago, 25-Aug-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: [part] Updated S\973S01.DAT
|
|
(...) Please tell me that this includes moving all of those accessories out of town,castle,space etc and into minifig where they belong... (24 years ago, 25-Aug-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: [part] Updated S\973S01.DAT
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Jonathan Wilson wrote: [quoting me from the previous message:] (...) That's the plan. Steve (24 years ago, 28-Aug-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: [part] Updated S\973S01.DAT
|
|
(...) How about "973p00.dat" (Pee-Zero-Zero)?... Franklin (24 years ago, 22-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: [part] Updated S\973S01.DAT
|
|
(...) All the existing decorated torsos have been revised and are with Steve (and guidance to authors of parts in progress is at (URL) is indeed a suitable name for blank torso with a neck mark - but does this actually exist? I cannot find one (...) (24 years ago, 23-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: [part] Updated S\973S01.DAT
|
|
(...) I would think that the most likely candidate for this would be the very set you referenced (<set: 6040 Blacksmith's Shop>), a set which I regret to say that I do not have. But, I do have a Blacksmith, from a recent trade, and after examining (...) (24 years ago, 23-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: [part] Updated S\973S01.DAT
|
|
(...) I cannot guarantee the providence of the torso in my 6040, or my 6285 (which has a plain yellow torso as the figurehead) as my copies of these sets are second-hand. Can anyone else help to answer this (x-posted to .general). Chris (24 years ago, 23-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: [part] Updated S\973S01.DAT
|
|
On Sat, 23 Dec 2000, Chris Dee (<G61Mq4.H63@lugnet.com>) wrote at 23:03:40 (...) There are no marks on either of my figurehead torsos, both of which came from MISB sets. (24 years ago, 24-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.general)
|
