 | | [part] mockup/for-post of 30407 [DAT]
|
|
i have several people asking what 30407 is. its not exactly finished. but im posting it so people can see what it is {I used swh4.dat for this {cause im lasy}} [unofficial/noncompleted post] 0 Name: sw30407.dat 0 Author: thomas burger 0 Inlined:1 16 (...) (25 years ago, 31-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Unofficial Part: 2500 1x8 Light Bar
|
|
Terry K <legoverse@geocities.com> wrote in message news:3750d68d.105626...net.com... (...) as (...) or (...) That is what I thought. And as far as I know, they are only used in this model. (...) the (...) That's what I'll do. I STILL have to change (...) (25 years ago, 30-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Unofficial Part: 2500 1x8 Light Bar
|
|
(...) If they are only used here, then a primitive is out. You could use a single subfile in the parts/s directory. But that is mainly used for subassemblies that are used repeatedly, and where the use would significantly save space and simplify (...) (25 years ago, 30-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: virtual parts
|
|
(...) Nope. No binaries of any kind. Odd thing is, I thought the lugnet server would have filtered out the binary stuff, or rejected the posting altogether. -- Terry K -- (25 years ago, 30-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: virtual parts
|
|
word of advice.. no zip files?? heheh ok www.geocities.com/ar...rparts.zip www.geocities.com/ar...trcars.zip (25 years ago, 29-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: Unofficial Part: 2500 1x8 Light Bar [DAT]
|
|
Jeff Stembel <Dragonelf1@aol.com> wrote in message news:FC8rCo.8Ku@lugnet.com... (...) Man! I GOTTA get the "Reply" and "Reply Group" buttons down! ;) Yes, they ARE a mistake, as well as the chrome interior. Here is a revised part for your perusal. (...) (25 years ago, 29-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Portion of Element 30358 [DAT]
|
|
This file is referenced in the message "part question: 30358" in lugnet.cad.dev. 0 Name: 30358box.dat 0 Author: Karim Nassar 0 Unofficial Sub-Part 2 24 10 0 20 -10 0 20 2 24 -10 0 20 -10 0 -20 2 24 -10 0 -20 10 0 -20 2 24 10 0 -20 10 0 20 2 24 10 0 (...) (25 years ago, 29-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Corrected part: 32054 Technic Pin Long with Stop Bush [DAT]
|
|
0 I've corrected the identical vertices problem with this part, and 0 checked it with l3p -check. I'm still holding it for a couple of more 0 days before sending it to Terry K, though, in case someone finds even 0 more errors. Thanks. 0 Technic Pin (...) (25 years ago, 28-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Corrected part: 32039 Technic Connector with Axlehole [DAT]
|
|
0 I've corrected the identical vertices problem with this part, and 0 checked it with l3p -check. I'm still holding it for a couple of more 0 days before sending it to Terry K, though, in case someone finds even 0 more errors. Thanks. 0 Technic (...) (25 years ago, 28-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Mistake in 2-4cyli?
|
|
Hi Steve, I disagree with your reasoning. (...) 2-4cyli.dat's (...) If I use 2-4cyli as the 'edge' of a part, such as a window shutter, then on one side I would have an edge line with an optional line over it, and on the other side I would just have (...) (25 years ago, 28-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: [Mock-up] Tie Fighter Windscreen
|
|
thanks for that. i now have most of the important starwars parts (25 years ago, 28-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Mistake in 2-4cyli? [DAT]
|
|
(...) I just looked at the file. It seems to be OK. There's one 1 conditional line for each quad, which is right. Notice that this setup gives a conditional line on one edge of the half-cylinder, but not on the other. With one side edged, and the (...) (25 years ago, 27-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Mistake in 2-4cyli?
|
|
For the Primitives Committee, I think I might have found a mistake in 2-4cyli. It seems there is an optional line missing (or 1 too many). I have worked out an analysis, but I can't figure out how to post it to lugnet. So if someone will send out an (...) (25 years ago, 27-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | [Mock-up] Tie Fighter Windscreen [DAT]
|
|
(...) Sure. Here's one. 0 FILE 30366.DAT 0 Windscreen 6 x 3 x 5 0 Name: 30366.dat 0 Author: Steve Bliss 0 Mock-up Element 1 16 -20 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 3068.DAT 1 16 20 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 3068.DAT 1 16 -50 -24 10 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 3070.DAT 1 16 (...) (25 years ago, 27-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Un-Official Part: 30358 (SW Landspeeder Engine) [DAT]
|
|
This piece has evolved from a Mock-Up through to its current form, a nearly completed part. There are some problems with it... A couple of lines that should not be there, and a few that should. I'm particularly interested in suggestions on how to (...) (25 years ago, 26-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Technic hose - 12 [DAT]
|
|
This is an attempt at a technic style tube of length 12 studs. It is a repost of a previous version which suffered from line wrap. Please refer to the notes and other part files (~th.dat and ~4-4co89.dat) in the "Technic hose - 9" posting. 0 FILE (...) (25 years ago, 26-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Technic hose - 9 [DAT]
|
|
(This is a repost of my former posting, which suffered from line wrap. Hopefully I've fixed it - if not let me know:-) Here is an initial cut at the Technic-style hoses (or tubes, or whatever). Please let me know how to improve them - this is my (...) (25 years ago, 26-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
