Subject:
|
Re: Unofficial Part: 2500 1x8 Light Bar
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dat.parts
|
Date:
|
Sun, 30 May 1999 06:17:22 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
845 times
|
| |
|
|
On Sat, 29 May 1999 14:23:53 GMT, "Kevin B" <kevinb01@netfocus.net> wrote:
>
> Jeff Stembel <Dragonelf1@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:FC8rCo.8Ku@lugnet.com...
> > In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Kevin Bane writes:
> > > I don't have this finished, it needs the openings on the bottom for the
> > > light globes.
> > >
> > > Check it out and let me know what you think.
> >
> >
> > Why is the bottom red? Is this a mistake?
> >
> > Jeff
>
>
> Man! I GOTTA get the "Reply" and "Reply Group" buttons down! ;)
>
> Yes, they ARE a mistake, as well as the chrome interior. Here is a revised
> part for your perusal.
>
>
> Now, next question: Should the 'lights' be a separate primitive (as far as
> I know, this is the ONLY piece on which they are used), a separate piece, or
> part of the piece itself?
If they are only used here, then a primitive is out.
You could use a single subfile in the parts/s directory. But that is mainly
used for subassemblies that are used repeatedly, and where the use would
significantly save space and simplify construction. And possibly be re-used in
other specialized parts, but does not qualify as a primitive.
In looking at the file, it appears the lights are not very large, and the
overall file size is not too bad. In that case, you might as well inline the
lights and leave them in the file. Remember, you can safely delete all those
extra lines beginning with zero. Clean up the unneeded lines.
-- Terry K --
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Unofficial Part: 2500 1x8 Light Bar
|
| Terry K <legoverse@geocities.com> wrote in message news:3750d68d.105626...net.com... (...) as (...) or (...) That is what I thought. And as far as I know, they are only used in this model. (...) the (...) That's what I'll do. I STILL have to change (...) (25 years ago, 30-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Unofficial Part: 2500 1x8 Light Bar [DAT]
|
| Jeff Stembel <Dragonelf1@aol.com> wrote in message news:FC8rCo.8Ku@lugnet.com... (...) Man! I GOTTA get the "Reply" and "Reply Group" buttons down! ;) Yes, they ARE a mistake, as well as the chrome interior. Here is a revised part for your perusal. (...) (25 years ago, 29-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
