 | | Stl2dat settings?
|
|
Hi folks, as a stl2dat toddler I'd like to know what kind of settings you use for the conversion with a spot on: -eps value (default 0.01) -teps value : minimum distance for coincidence (default 0.001) -deps value : maximum determinant for coplanar (...) (17 years ago, 9-Nov-07, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Stl2dat settings?
|
|
Hi folks, as a stl2dat toddler I'd like to know what kind of settings you use for the conversion with a spot on: -eps value (default 0.01) -teps value : minimum distance for coincidence (default 0.001) -deps value : maximum determinant for coplanar (...) (17 years ago, 9-Nov-07, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Non-fluo trans orange?
|
|
(...) You're right. My mistake. -Orion (17 years ago, 29-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Non-fluo trans orange?
|
|
(...) I don't know what LEGO color T182 is, but based on Philippe's title, I'm guessing it's the (relatively) new trans orange (non-fluorescent). Assuming this is the case, then color 57 isn't it. --Travis (17 years ago, 29-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Non-fluo trans orange?
|
|
(...) Per the ldconfig.ldr ((URL) file, color 57 is correct. -Orion (17 years ago, 29-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Part 2609b
|
|
Dean Earley schrieb: (...) Hi, the current 2609 should be renamed to 2609a. cu mikeheide (17 years ago, 29-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Part 2609b
|
|
Dean Earley schrieb: (...) Hi, maybe this (URL) helps. I only have one part and that has also a groove. On the pictures also only parts with groove are shown. So maybe it has always grooves. cu mikeheide (17 years ago, 29-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Part 2609b
|
|
(...) As I'm rewriting 2609 to make use of a load more primitives, is there a version of either of these without the groove? The current LDraw part doesn't but all my real pieces do. (17 years ago, 29-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Part 2609b
|
|
Hi all. I have a magnet holder labelled 2609 but is about 4 LDU taller than the current part. Shall I just submit it as 2609b and what needs to be done with the current 2609? Thanks (17 years ago, 29-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Non-fluo trans orange?
|
|
How should LEGO color T182 be coded? These parts: (URL) Ldraw color 57 but this is not correct... Philo (17 years ago, 29-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: NonCA-parts in need of re-writing
|
|
(...) Part 905.dat and 905c01.dat done! (sometimes it takes a bit ;-) I have updated the page at ldraw.org - (URL) as well as the Wiki - (URL) please give the Re-writes - (URL) high priority! w. (17 years ago, 22-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: L(EGO)Draw part discrepancies
|
|
(...) hi folks, we still seek some input on the parts above. if you have the real version of those please measure/compare and let us know. w. (17 years ago, 17-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New POV-dat: 3062bL46.dat - Brick 1 x 1 Round Yellow with POV Light
|
|
(...) It depends. Do you want the light to act more like it would through LEGO parts or do you want it to imitate a real car's headlights...? Anyway, the choice the user's. All you have to do is write the spotlight definitions ans run it through (...) (17 years ago, 16-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New POV-dat: 3062bL46.dat - Brick 1 x 1 Round Yellow with POV Light
|
|
(...) strange when the headlights cast shadows backwards :-) (17 years ago, 16-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New POV-dat: 3062bL46.dat - Brick 1 x 1 Round Yellow with POV Light
|
|
(...) At least, Jonathan's car now has gotten its original headlights back now - yet yellow instead of white. (URL) (17 years ago, 16-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New POV-dat: 3062bL46.dat - Brick 1 x 1 Round Yellow with POV Light
|
|
(...) Sorry, don't have the time to make models right now. I am currently writing a program to automatically create dat files of "shining" parts. I call it datshine.exe and I am very excited over it. Well, here's one quite strange model I rushed (...) (17 years ago, 15-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New POV-dat: 3062bL46.dat - Brick 1 x 1 Round Yellow with POV Light
|
|
(...) Pictures, we want pictures :-) (17 years ago, 15-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | New POV-dat: 3062bL46.dat - Brick 1 x 1 Round Yellow with POV Light [DAT]
|
|
(...) Thanks Anders! Only took half a year from idea to completion on this part ... /Tore 0 Brick 1 x 1 Round with Hollow Stud Yellow with POV Light 0 Name: 3062bL46.dat 0 Author: Tore Eriksson 0 Unofficial part 0 // based on work by James Jessiman (...) (17 years ago, 15-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: L(EGO)Draw part discrepancies
|
|
(...) against official or non-official (...) differences. (...) comment? (LUT version may not match real parts, see (...) I measured the real part and confirm that the LUT-part is correct! Matching the PT-Version (Trans-White) with the LUT-Version (...) (17 years ago, 11-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Are multiple AUTHOR tags legit?
|
|
(...) I think there should only ever be one primary author - nowadays, the one that takes the responsibility of submitting to the Parts Tracker. During the CA header migration, where I have encountered this and assessed that it was a true (...) (17 years ago, 11-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
