Subject:
|
Re: Part 2609b
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dat.parts
|
Date:
|
Mon, 29 Oct 2007 20:16:27 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4528 times
|
| |
|
|
Dean Earley schrieb:
> Dean Earley wrote:
> > Hi all.
> >
> > I have a magnet holder labelled 2609 but is about 4 LDU taller than
> > the current part.
> > Shall I just submit it as 2609b and what needs to be done with the
> > current 2609?
>
> As I'm rewriting 2609 to make use of a load more primitives, is there a
> version of either of these without the groove?
> The current LDraw part doesn't but all my real pieces do.
Hi,
the current 2609 should be renamed to 2609a.
cu
mikeheide
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Part 2609b
|
| (...) As I'm rewriting 2609 to make use of a load more primitives, is there a version of either of these without the groove? The current LDraw part doesn't but all my real pieces do. (17 years ago, 29-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
